Show V THE DEAR SmilEY LETTEL V Paragraph Read to Court Contains the Word WOd 1 Santiago Santi Sati tiago go and Not Cienfuegos V Dewey Wants v ants Facts Facts V VV V I Washington Oct Com Corn mandor Hodgson formed navigator ol ot Commodore flagship the Brooklyn continued his testimony be before b before fore tore the court of ot Inquiry today after Home HOle of the th other winess ol ot yesterday hud had boen bucit buel given an sn opportunity ity I to correct their testimony t When hen his court adjourned night Commands Hodgson wa Wil was In lii 11 tho tile hands haull of ot Judge Judie Advocate Lemly whose examination ol ot otI I him hll partook very tery largely of at the Uio of ot a 1 cross This was Walt Wi duo duoto dUoto dUoto to the time fact that Mr rr Hodgson hail had hat been een coiled colled cale by both sides sidel of ot the time controversy My and und was considered even more mure a I witness than n It government witness I Capt CallI Lemly and Mr dr Ir Hannu continued the Inquiry for tor fo the tue at i 1 hI he beginning of ot the tho sitting today tol a after ater which Mr sIr began logan a n series of ot questions Intended to present the side elIte of ot tile the tw conduct of ot the Brook Brooklyn Brooklyn lyn during not Ilot only the battle buttle bate of or July 3 but of ot tile the Santiago campaign I Mr Inquiries were Wert devoted devole lo to I developing snore mure of ot the details concern ern ernIn Ins ing In the bombardment of ot the tile Shill Cristobal Colon on May 3 The Thi entire entro correspondence between Com Commander om emil mander Inn er and Commodore Schley taa also put Iut In as al evidence COURT FATIGUED The Tile court ourt began belan Its Is session today with wih the tIle undemanding that thiro would l I only one sitting Bitting Tina Til agree agreement agreement ment was vas reached readied yesterday and was IH brought about by I the tile fact that th t Dm tho members of tIme the court and the tue counsel find themselves greatly fatigued by hy the tue exacting nature of at their work urk and ami the tue continuous sessions of the court There hore Is much Interest In yesterdays episode concerning Admiral Sampson and there IB Is II still tl doubt douM as to whether he lie wilt wIll wi be a witness winess It I will 11 remain with wih Admiral and hit his hil counsel to o 0 say sa for tor what tiny day du It If for any aims an V he shall be called The Time controversy a I as to lu the tJ admirals a meaning In ills his Dear Schley dispatch of or May Ma 20 lIfts has In ill no 10 wipe wl iso o been b en abated by J the tentatIve agreement as to his hil being summoned Counsel Coun el on Oil both oth sides sidel tillS this morning had hail before them copies Collies of the dispatch and ana each was tas as trying strenuously to t bring the tile other to their view of at the tit case casE The Tite first of ot the tile witnesses of at the pre pie day who were wera recalled to t their testimony 11 Doyle Dle who ho waSon as on time the tie Brooklyn during the battle oft off He made a I number of ot changes In fr JI Ills Hit attention was wals coiled called cald to to an 1 on crier or ill Iii his hil former otiller testimony In stating the distance the Brooklyn rollyn stood out train from the Mono Mario ht at lt II togo in I reI to a tt I question front from the court court Ho 10 lb had JmJ formerly fOlmer placed the distance at two tuu or three 11 but he lie had erroneously bused lila his on tIme log hog for fO ut June JUlIO 26 G 6 Instead of ut May Ia 28 Looking nt at the time log for May 11 20 26 he hl found only tint of at the tile d dl ilL Lance tance out placing 11 It I nt ut seven miles When Doyle was excused again u up the question Que Uon of time the til difference of o construction of ot the thelast last paragraph of If the Dear Schley letter Hi lie IJ produced the original copy coW rending reading a part of or the paragraph a M as asoh oh kt Sl THE TIE ORIGINAL PRODUCED I r therefore am of ot the opinion that our best hest chance of ot success In capturing their ships wIlt will bo IJU to hold hol the two point anti and Havana with withal all al the time force we e call cati muster If It later laterI It I should develop that those these vessels are areat areat areat at Santiago we ito could then hell assemble off ar that port time the best suited for tor forthe or the tue purpose anti and completely blockade It II Until we WI then receive more po IvI l live lve Information we shall shah continue to 10 hold Havana luvana and amI Santiago apt thin said sall It If I the court pl please ase I was yesterday requested by b counsel for tor the tile applicant to produce the time original of at the tile letter roin rol Admiral Sampson to Schley dated May 20 1598 the tile question queston being as la to 0 till the filial dual name at the enil tl of If t the first paragraph whether it should be Cienfuegos or Santiago 1 I have hae the original anti and tile the name ap alt peats Santiago and Ind opi appears ears over or an I in 1 Io attention to the Ile tad fait that In the tile press copy COP book It Is JI Santi Santiago Sant Santiago ago aHa which shows that the tile change was mat before tho leler letter was copied arni sent I add dd ll that the tie punctuation is s 1 Q In the time press r d UP lie als miso 01 at lh the request Jt f Admiral V Ihley Introduced another CP copy py in which he said IBM you will still See e timer Ws Was nl no c n It I originally nn as R Santiago The lie e court examined e the original pa P pr per r of or the press copies cOle with wih care and p it ii wa was agreed that the tle papers ra ers should he be printed In lit the record Capt Capt Lemly then requested that all al the paper In Admiral chles beating beaming upon time the e cue case e be IO fi and Mr Ir nor 1 for Cor It the b admiral a that mat i lie he Schley Schier had no n moo pa pa is HODGSON MAKES V LI ut Cum Com rn Hodgson was waR then called calUd to correct his testimony of yesterday He lie le 81 asked by Capt o Lemly Lelly about hit his hi with wih Admiral Schley concerning what the Judge JUle advocate de V nominated a newspaper r colloquy Thu The witness Jn s took exception to the time me Ule of or the word colloquy and Capt Lemly replied that tills was tas ue time the own on ch r V Time letters w wee were re then thon wad read by b thu the Judge advocate Commander V Identifying the various documents as V they wen werE l Mr Me I desired time the loiter lter should 11 be t accepted as ni evidence and that th they y V could coull be l printed without being tenth road nl apt I replied how er that he hI that the tile letters letter letle have ai 11 a Important bearing up n U th nail that therefore he lie preferred p terrt t l ti rp j read rend them V While th the readIng of or the lett n ri 1 be bet te V t tween e n Schly Sebley and amId ant Hodgson and III 4 PAr paper articles lu b hearing up ulm jn the time cones was a In iii Sir lr I to 10 the reading of or one nf of the newspaper statements an as al t WU WR WANT WAN Admiral Dewey Tho e things could all hint have b bOti m printed You II an are ar time Little Uni here hII Vo We 01 want fueLs fact V We Ve d il ml 1111 lant newspaper arti attl articles ort dee cles del We have I timeRs twe out oUI Cannot these matters in L b printed d Capt Lemly Then they ther would be In V V evidence Do ou tsu mean menn you ou dont want V VV V them at itt all nl T V V Admit Di w want th them m Could they not b be like other pu pt l lIers lel V Mr tr Haynor We w It t everything that passed een S ansI and Commodore Sebley Iy that appertain to tl this controversy but bill bt W we would wapIti mt net nt Ilk II this r ul to V alti a ln t I 1 do to Mt it t V think there ought to he In ln th tb t trel V VV VV V V record rel ot an editorial A thil Behle or any nn other or In favor nf or him hll which Wil never n by ity Ad Admiral Au miral at all ni That article articie was Wab O not nol sent 1011 In any letter leter to Admiral A V T 1 T siy not Capt Capt It Is really a 1 part of at the tue anti and referred to We Wedo Wedo V do 10 not contend for tor one moment that any am that t hn t may atay mi hf he mad mat In that editorial r against Admiral are arl proof of ot what wilE these thene the allegations atc are but Jut this tills Is a n part of ot time the correspondence rOrt and necessary n In determining as to V what was wal the propriety of or Commodore V V conduct conduit In ill the premises V Mr Haynor Would jou ou take a n statement from trai rota mo mc now that Admiral Schley says he never saw Bil It I nd never received It Judge Advocate You have hae made that statement Mr V I do not net think this record ought to t be he strained with these calumnies against Admiral Schley The Tho court then retired for tor or consulta Lion ton and after a n few tel minutes minute returned making the following announcement through Admiral Admirl Dewey Dewe The This court decides that any nn clippings from fromn newspapers which form torm a part hart of the tile correspondence between Admiral V Schley and Limit Commander Hodgson should be properly tenth read Mr Raynor May It I the court there 1 Is no evidence to tu show that this particular I editorial forms a part pat of the time correspondence or that It was WB ever received by It h Admiral Schley Shley Admiral Admirl Dewey Under that ruling It ought not to be read After the further reading of letters leters V and before the tho entire correspondence 1 I hail had been exhibited time the court at nt I adjourned until Monday Monda |