Show HUBBARD TRIAL V STILL GOING ON V Case Continues Behind Closed Doors boors Before Judge J ud o Stewart ll V t A FEW BREEZY roIA V T I I II T I T TIll TAIl UI Slur lor nf or Ibo ho CIo Olo 10 V atul itt Now oW I Il lr The trial or of W K J Hubbard Is s sill I Judge Stewart nm An AnA a n Jury From Its Ito commencement th thu hns hM been conducted behind closet doors the court bailiff has hus ex ox excluded eluded every evry front from the tho cour court courtr member of oC th the room r orn who la ti not nol no either a n 1 bur Jr or a representative of ot the press pro 9 I After the question of at tIe the ty of ot it testimony lending endIng to throw somo light on the tho past pats life ute of or the had been decided by tha Ihn lao court ourt who gus OUO the objection becton of or the defense rul rulIng Ing jn that the examination should bocon ho bo con lined to Issues In case The rho court sale ot otI that It 1 appeared to bo ho extending the I rule too far when specific nets In the tta V past life of the tho defendant wore were allowed to be bo admitted in testimony This Tho was wai wain wasti n ti t victory vIctor for Cor JUny JURY SAW TJ lt I Last night Deputy Sheriff I I Naylor pok took the Jury jUr to see litO 10 A Texas j teer at lit tho Salt Lake Theater V TOJ AYS PROCEEDINGS t 1 t Immediately the tho opening o ocourt ot or orI I court tills this morning J made nado tv n t motion that us no It woo wag desirable to get set through with the tho trial by byI i 1 Wednesday evening as no Thursday Thur was wao r 7 I 1 I to be bo a 11 holiday oti on account of or tho the Presidents dents funeral hereafter night I l M 1 held Judge Powers objected Ho lIe 1 Bald ho had to lO be bo nt nl a his 1119 office at nl 8 S Sa I a In tho the morning to see seo clients t that ho had to take n a lusty lunch and andI 1 I see sea more clients till 2 ocl ck In III the af ne afternoon J and that by b evening ho he really t I felt too tired to come corno back to court J attain again Judge Stewart did not rule on onI I tho motion Ho lie wild said that lint as us the lao trial I I he lie would decide whether It l 1 j would be kc to hold night ses soo sessions cs II The Tho Jury Jur was waa then dismissed and At AI Attorney AtI torney continued to cite authorities J I ties tlell In support of o the defenses dd stand j the Iho defendant cannot bo ho 1 with regard to other crimes by byI I means menns of or which the tha prosecution socks jecks j to test Ibo tho credibility of or the he defendant I and ond throw some light on un hip lais past liast life liCe V ARGUMENTS I Tho The arguments of at counsel were con cona eluded nt tt 11 when the court sus sustained a I tamed the objection of or the defense f TESTIFIES I I After tho Jury ury had been leen recalled and Vt t I Hubbard had been put Ut on the tho thoI I stand Mr dr I asked him If Ie ho lao laud had I employed and paid a l private detective detectiveS V I Vi DO to gather ther ather evidence regarding his hisa a l S t good goo 1 character Defendant denied that 1 ho hail had but admitted that he ho employed one man Alford whom he paid 1300 00 a u I month V Do you mean to tell this Jury that t 4 you OU did not know that Ella Jensen Jeneen wan IM V stopping at Alfords house hOll staid said the tho thea V district attorney walking up to the tM a 1 stand and shaking a menacing fore tore forefinger forea linger finger In Ia his face taco a Witness inese demurred You want to shuttle out of or It said satti I f Mr Ir Attorney up objected I I i to Mr method of oC questioning I j and another storm In a 1 teapot arose aroe I at the tho ml of or which Hubbard said paid that I he ho did not know of or his own knowledge that Kiln l lIn Jensen was stopping at Al At Alfords fouls fords house i Asked hether whether he knew how much money he had paid Alford witness said that without looking It II up he could not tell tellS S V When hlll did dill you ou pay him the first t money I dont recollect exactly It might t have bave aaVO been three weeks ago aeo now How much I I believe It was ma 10 I belloto ho he has ban been paid by brother pretty nearly all nil that Is coining to him about 1450 I Youre a I a single lingle mUll man continued the prosecutor I Yes YeL I Never Neer been married S NoS No S Fond of or children tt Yes S Judge Powers then took the tho witness b again Tho witness 8 told him luau that he lie lieV I had hod seen een favorable recommendations of or V him from Crom the Northern Railroad company and others which had f I obtained Ho lie said laId that ho he had baa em employed employed employed Alford lford tt as he knew that an nc no tivo tIo Interest was flU being taken taketa against S him by liy the police and ami It was IDS vas absolute absolutely ly h necessary to get some lame evidence Dhow Ing lag Ills bin t good character lIe He said that the district dl attorney tho the county attorney Brown and Attar and Dininny had been working against him What have I done lOne against you ou shouted Prosecutor You VOU fled to set get et four men Inca on that J Jury who land had shown absolutely that I they thay were adverse to me inc retorted tho the defendant I Judge Judg Power lowern objected to the tho dis discussion aIm between council oun and witness and the court ruled that It cease cense Mr I melmor tried to get the witness to say sayS S that he had seen nen nothing In the work walk done by b him which wan unfair but the tho defense aind the court sun BUS trained 1 the objection This Thin concluded the lie of or tho the defendant ant and flir I 1 Savage gnA of ot the tha firm Onn fl of ft C It n J Co 0 wan wn then called He 11 tei t tilled that the store usually lual rinsed at al 7 I but bul that on April th It being I conference time tl tho the store was proba probably probably V bly 11 later on that date DAMAGE SUIT SUT PILES FILm ADMITTED I Judge Towers Powers again asked that the lie files flics S of ot the damage damAR suit null be It admitted f In testimony Mr laIr objected The court ruled that the flies fIles Ilos might be b admitted In evidence for Cor the purpose of o shown what Interest the ing witness had In lii tl the ease cone cut This Tub was another point pint scored b La tile tilt defense m PROVISIONALLY I Judge Powers ower then announced that 1 tho the defense dr n its Iti II caw care with wih the 1 proviso that If I the Bute wished to 10 re cc recall recal I call cal witness 1 la Jensen Jenen the defense F might her In redirect exam examination 0 The TM then d its Ut rebut rebuttal tel tal Mra Frances Knox Helens moth mother oW oWer V til er or wt calk to tn the She Mid lid she ahe hail never neer tried to imi IrIt rl Helen asto as u asto uto to what hat she Ih abo In I ii n Ih sh ho admitted 1 C that he laud had isId the block blockon blockS blok on Thursday hurd April AIrn l th i S SlAt HAD NOT BuRN ELLA I Mrs Humphrey w Wi won i nf t recalled by bythe bylie I Ithe 3 the lie State Stale the She MM HI Hit Ibl rt P pi did alid not net nt 4 know kno fMla fla Jensen sal and had hd never seen her ber Ii r In Ira The tho Realty building bonding bul ln O ON a TIm THE STAND l I county UtI Attorney Loot r t bout bour w wu v U x put IUt juL en e ibe tM U AI J 11 u ut bur t t V It h u I is i I T CUU miu B L t I uN Mc lc V 4 t 1 MUster Allister Allster had room nely block bl c on April prU He lie said that mu mp sero taken anti old then the fur fui furniture was moved around sonic some SOIl MRS ms KNOX RECALLED Mr Mrs Knox w was n again r nUo at testified tc that th t Mrs Lawler had hAl neve neer neveal bald al Id to iter hur that th t they thoy must lust Hubbard Hubbard or that tUU aho HIU n nud any of at hi lii hil money This concluded the tho with wih the of or what oun t x to 10 from Crol Elta Jensen J ll wh whit she sho h Is ii I recalled at ot 2 It I noW not looke but Q 1 r tow fo ow minutes of or noon non ati an anlie tho lie lr t Ivok ok A recess rf until ulti STORY STOny Defendant W U 1 b was wai Iliac ilac ell e oh on 01 tl stand at U J uil e i ck cac Ci ye eNI and anal nl nn iii Ild euti tell lel 4 3 h 1 il Kl bi h nor lana him n it I rG n m n lulled luau him a Ii h he r rIi v i M 1 th JUlI a n 0 on oi CI hats ht e el i In a UK I a audit and pr iu I I he UM 41 I the n a oun in It I claimed that tOe Ihl ju t e ut ur this lain line Une o of n Ii v s 0 merely u I a the V s o lio lw Jury Tail iu it Il um an Judge the jur while counsel couns l argued arguti the questIn Cup I Hubbard made a good witness wile foi to himself Ills Hla Hi story atory vati wais wal tho the saline name all nt ta n Judge Jute outlined It In i hi his hla opening of Ilat It The defendant wild said fl that ho Is 3 yean old and all born bOt of or Quaker In Illinois Ho 10 graduated In In Iii 1883 and for throe yearn practice i In that ho and hi hiI brother K H 8 B Hubbard went sont to Leu 10 I and engaged In the real estat business He lie le came Caine to tl Suit Lake In ISO I O I and pl Rut followed real and ami mining and also excursion agent t tHIP rr ii the HIP 11 Northern Pacific railway raI WI He lie Il wai vati Wil president of or f the tho tle chamber of or commerce one ame year Ia Hu ha lt to canto riom In II tM tha block on au March I 1 1900 and Ivel there till 1111 11 April year ear earTho The Tho defendant said oak that he laud had ass nev never ne assor er or mot met Mr rl The Tho first time he In Inland land had met Helen hlen he tie wild said Mil was Wll on Satur Saturday SaturIn dl day In April He lIe recounted tin the story of or meeting lichen Helen and ald MattU Matthi Thompson on First fouth street nn and Helens asking to buy bu her a n rabbit tIn the two children mooting meeting him again or on Kant East Temple street Just jU below the Ken iCon Kenyon Iel yon yen on on the tw child childs importuning It hll hut In again to buy hoc her some borne Jewelry Mid fl n r a few tew minutes later inter to buy tn them for Jor the tho Sanitarium which ho did anil went on to the candy cand store next the thc th corner r of or West Temple street return returning lag ing u a few minutes later and going 1110 the Sanitarium After coining cOlln out he ha lall ho did not nt see eco either cither of or the girls gina again that audit Hubbard then Ihen ex explained the Incident of or Helen Knox be he being h heln ing ln ng In his room In tho the Realty Henly block He lie said that ho he went up towards dusk dunk wd nd saw the two hv tc girls In itt the hall Later Ilter Jelen Helen had bath walked Into Inlo Mi lain room while h lie io was brushing brush In his hlf coat coal Ot preparatory to o going holn out lut Sho She had lad commenced up things s She he opened a In in him hil bureau and took out a 1 bracelet which she sl put on her arm aria armIk Ik lie e asked her ber to take It off or but Helen would not and ran round the room and anal seated herself heiselt herMi on the lied bed He Ifs 19 followed her er and caught hold holt of ot tho childs arm armand and ind took tonic tho the off She struggled rde fled told him to stop that he lie hurt haunt hurther haunter tier her er She then thol left the tho room These rhese are aro arelio tho lio he words that landlady Lawler Iwler claims haims she heard the Iho child exclaim at athe atthe atho he the time Um when tho the alleged assault was lall mid aid to have taken Inken place Hubbard soul that after Helen lichen Knox I nox iad had gone gOle ho lao turned turn 1 on his light and anal lound that another bracelet was wn inis mils In ng and a I silk lk handkerchief Ho lie denied having oven oveis given tho lie a n kodak or any ni money monet except CO GO celts rents to go to the on the tho Saturday when ho he first frt met her AFTERNOON SESSION Ella El Jensen was Wal put Iut upon tho the stand tho ho first thing after tho the noon recess reces Mr Ir asked her If IC she oho had paid to o 0 Mrs Mr Chandler that after nt r the Hub nn trial Was 8 over aver ehe pho would go after tr Inn rs Knox Witness s denied having made such a n or saying Haying that er money mone would woul hn be safe ae In any nn case caBe Mrs Mra Jane Jano Chandler wa wl was thin then culled 11 n a rebuttal She lilac raid aid she nhe lived Ind at W 42 lain Iain and had lived In II Bait Iatt Lake since Inee anal was Wa 59 years old She Sho octal suld sull hat she he hind Imd h l had hall a 11 conversation with Jensen In which the tatter latter Inter lanaI had the Hubbard trial was waa I aid that after ICer WIl iver Ver she would go for fo Mrs Knox The prosecution then Ihen tested rested and the Immediately after announced hat that It rested also After AUer I u V little counsel counrel on ach ohio Ille agreed that two and 1111 louts lOUIS each would be length at if f time for the arguments argument arid and 11 the court cour that that hint length of ot time bo be linseed to each i At quarter past Ia t two District commenced his hil ad nt adrose dres rose to 0 the Jury jUf He lie le d that Ir f r tho court pleased he might Iu In Instruct el the ho lie Jury jail to Inspect hubbards room and anal hat that adjoining In the Realty block Powers thought this th would be a n of ot time am this the court thought hat that It I would be B ary Ho lie call cl of r Deputy Depuy d attention to the thc testimony ty 1 y Sleater lit In ro that lira Irs Knox had toM tell her daughter to 10 oil ell tho the truth Why h hail had the defense o ont tol mt Lot call coll Deputy euty Arnup he nt ell testify tout to the sauna IN Judge and Mr Ir Mr Ir Lipp nan were the tho Innocent dupe I un In this Ihl use ace They The did not Intend to do rive you Me 1 called 1 pt nl 1 n to th H I of Ella J la Jensen Jonse that there ther wa WahId a 00 hId ur or Jr WO in the ease caret ao fur for her lien and her hermint mint denial that she sho would gi JI g after Mrs Irl nox for the money lony and anal the tho neat of or this thin statement by Mr Mrs Chant Chlud ler or Cr He lie drew attention to tn the f ct hat tha the court would Instruct the Jury hat It If they tile lint hall reason rew rOn n to disbelieve ho tho of any Wita they th would hae ave tave tho tIm right to throw out nil all 11 the lie too tes of that witness Who Vho U Is I tho the Mephistopheles In the thc en nse e thundered the state tall pre Why h the thea man anna who was a drawing the inanely salary of 1 00 a r ert Talking of oC the testimony nf of Weather Veather Murdoch that the sun lun lint hud hudor or the most mOlt of or the day of ot April Apri lith lh Iron eem behind a n bank of nf clouds counsel that the expression was wan WIS like flUe the tho Ihl of ot Judge Powers Th Thi jury JUr unit that tho the whole defense a n bank batik of or clouds cloud This was wasis w ws 1 is ns s far as counsel reached when this rinsed cloel |