Show CA CATHOLIC JURORS JUROR R IN IN- IN N l t nit s i Because a Roman Catholic bishop was waa wa n a puny to lo nn an action aton tio rho lower court ex ax ox- ox ch eluded chided ded from the tho Jury nl all persona o of Roman Ro Ro- man lan Catholic r faith lh without co lo their residence or to lo any coso affiliation lon with attic wih Iho tho local church on the ground grund th t they havo a pecuniary Interest In t the tha suit sett 1 1 analogous to that which taxpayers havo have hav In a n suit sull against B tho rho city or or town In n which thc they reside e. e Tho Th judicial judica I court of Massachusetts 1 In fn Searle vs ve Roman Ro Ro- Rom man Catholic bishop of ot Springfield S Northeastern orth Reporter SW 80 holds that that It c cannot bo ha Said ald Id that every every- ever person of or tho Catholic faith raith In In n a n bishops bishop's diocese has hag Js such pecuniary Interest as R the court can cn take tako tko notice of In eo c every church owned own d by bytho the tho bishop In evey part of ot tho rho diocese and sail aa ns would wO ld Incapacitate him biro from tram actIns at act act- In Ins as es af Juror tutor In a Involving Its prop prop- city erty Defendants Defendant's s right to have the tha ex oz excluded eluded mon coon Hit act lt as ns jurors juror unless challenged b by plaintiff a was RS ns violated and nt at the outset out out- set act It ga J o plaintiff nn an additional power of or choice choie making his right of peremptory challenge relatively moro more valuable while defendants defendant a similar right was mode mado rela eels l Ines Ift valuable |