Show I I I UTAH COMPANIES IT NOT UT AFFECTED BY COURTS COURY DECISION Such uch Is Confident nt A Assertion of Both Railroads ds and Coal Concerns Here The rul ruling g of the tho supreme court pf the thc United States regarding coal companies owned by railroad c companies will wU riot not n ot affect the traffic in coal ln tn this ol state te In tho the opinion of officers of both thc Hire tl railroads and the coal companies S She i iThe The he larger part of tho the comm commercial coal used used used-In In Is la supplied from tho the mines of the Utah Fuel company a majority of or th the stock of which Is owned by hy stockholders stockholders stockholders stock stock- holders In tho ho Gould However How V How How- ever e It I is said that ate are separate corporations with wih different sets sets' of officers or cent cers and It I Is confidently claimed almed that hint tho the r of ruling of the tho te supreme court ourt J have have no effect on companies Tho The other coal coat company which it was wa thought that the decision might affect Is tho Union Pacific Coal Coal company which stock Is OWleY b by In the Union UnIon Union Un Un- ion Pacific Railroad company An officer or- or car of the railroad company said this his morning moring that he did not think the decIsIon decision deci decI- sion would apply appl to to o that company and that even If I It ft did It I would have ha e bu little Ite effect as It Il wo would ld be but but- but buta a short Ihor time before the lie Union Pacific Coal Col compan company com corn pan pany would retire from the handling of coal yoal for commercial purposes He ic declared de do- dared cared that the amount amount of- of coal that was wa being used b by the HarrIman Hariman lines I Is In Increasing Increasing increasing In- In creasing al at such uch a rato rao that It I Is a question of but a short Hmo timo before boore the coal company will wl not he be able to supply more than th railroad demands |