| Show I I I l The Tho value or of college education Is a t 1 t perennial subject of lon one ono arI d never n cr to bo ho b settled The Theman man who hns ina made mado n a great business success In life Is very apt to under undervalue value lilu It while the tho college collego graduate Is Quito quilt liable to over value It The mo moment 4 M ment a man mun the theL L Idea Mea that it college education Is la an on end endY Y 4 of ot o Itself lr and not n a means menns to nn an end citti 1 I and If It he adheres to the tha Idea Iten ho Is turning Into n II toad tend that loads leads to tan fall failure ute tire Every l ver education Is practical It if It furthers the th object In life lire of at turn him who has hus received 1 It otherwise It Is not To th lie lieman man who Intends to devote his life lite it to lie tha study stud and teaching of or Latin rull ti and a n classical education U II I as J practical as all tho the most highly technical r and nOli scientific o education 18 it for lor him who I Intends to lo by a 11 mining or civil engin engineer t eer ear an nn architect or a II chemist All An AllI I education should tend to make moke KB ita ro re recipient roii ii t nt better prepared to fight the bat bot battle batI I I tit tie of life lICe along alan the thu line of oC his parti particular i t cular cutar choice and as thero are many man I choices there are necessarily many lines ii l of oC education n lion t 1 attention hns has r b been beon en drawn to the subject through some ime r reo re I by Ii Andrew Carnegie and Mr 4 r The former S The grad grail graduate Ill lalo has hag net th the chanc of oC as us against buy boy who the Ami Ant the latter laUer not lon bug I ugo told of b being ng at a 1 meeting of mil mu where only one was wa n a college bred man All the boys 1108 who vho ho have ontee haw hl not U become me Carne L gleo gleim by 11 a lung lone way nut this thU view of ot I the matter makes material the tL grOt standard by b which men are ar to toto tobe toI I be to ju n and l their lives Ih regulated I In a material world material U Is not to be tl the v vast st majority of men inca strive for It II anti and In tn a ari at vu ri r t u uirA man man HII must 4 i main aarn Un i their bread vu ri r t u uirA man man HII i main aarn Un i iby i 1 by the t Gf et f Hair brows brow It II ls by no means an tIming thin It U Is II the tue mo tao motive 1 tive prompting one to t strive for ma roe material i tenet that makes make the time strife no noble ble hlo or What U LI Mr Ir Camille doing In founding kUtt wl J t v at wealth uH ulOn n un u tits tile but iUt homage homM to those th very verr verrIn ery Institution In of or learning the tM e I from fro alAnd 1 he says 8 not the lie ft chant chance of M as l t t t the buy boy vhs swept th tit the lly H 11 his hta endowments cottage tol education fre fres he lie Is II the chance of material In life lite of or those thOM who ho I shall hall bw iU by b hits his hI That II hi hiI J 1 I I the 1 e tc l 11 Itt of ot his hll comment But there th re je re other succeSses IU In life me meI 1 than the of ot great I J Ic I B without which the lite Jor of faith would lie be limited Jl to toa ton toI a n nr ery great reat de r What of oC the sue uc ue ucC I C 4 M In III In art In dt Are Ar they to for Cor nothing It t is isI I I true they hw hav ha not all b bee n I pushed by b graduates 8 but mol li have hal Had J and eni end and hew Haw Hawthorne n i thorne M and amid ram Pars r I man Webster Mil anti devold tb miN to an tc of oC tat SM t wealth would nt Mt t lr Ir e han base boen bt tn much poorer thin than It Is Ii a In M U had and spiritual reaM lit litI I t A training Is Ie no ne that b It man s 11 Ill make a Mecca of ot life In any line neither U is the fIr f ft k cc t I such flUch training a n guarantee that he will I None cnn can say la that th the tho Cat fil and nd I would not have hR hem n greater Stell I r successes lle financially el I had they bb bitt n college trained no cnn can my ay ayt t they would The amI ni at of ool tiP education very lOry frequently f make maket iii t error of oC f putting Into t Mor conclusion than hart thy they have In their premises |
