Show 1 BEWARE OF To ro Dictate a n Libel to time tho Typewriter r rIs Is 16 to Publish I It ItA I IA ItA A decision ns nit lS to what whal constitutes n a 1 libelous publication In n a nor of or law la has haB been een recently recent handed d w n nb by b time the Maryland court coult of ot appeals win h should lead persons employing amanuenses and stenographers ti s i um care caro as ns to the subject ct matr of ot ofa otI ofa a I dictated letter leter According to Ihl d ti 1 damn tIme the first judicial deliverance of or a 1 state court of ot last resort deriding he the precise point the time publication df of It I t Id iI J tor ler dictated and typewritten and nod eon con containing libelous matter maier Is I legally c im rn pleto although Its Us contents n at t been made lade known to aims Inv per jers in n ith th r rHum Hum the stenographer The Time court urt ruiH rud Neither the prevalence of o nay nn I Iness IJ Lt I Ine ness fleas ne 1 customs or methods nor the th mrm sure sur of ot business hu which compels roe rI rIto to stenographic assistance a sl cnn can tru s that legal which Is la ll fral nor Mr l k that Innocent which would s gr la la actionable Nor cnn can tIme the f tart Kt thai Mint the stenographer Is IK under r t nl ci obligation ohl to regard all ni his tt emlo ers communications as ns 1 I ni nl niter tr ter the th reason nf of r the time matter Under the ruling y i Ih th the hf meaning and Intent of the libel 1111 law In of ot Maryland Is IA hc rj when the time objectionable matter I is dl a aed ed to the stenographer The Fhe hiel Ir is published under such c as Is R fully tul tar for legal le nl purposes R as th tim mch lu h hIt It were ere printed In n r newspaper mind and pub broadcast No ca e pr the name Iamo fact acts appears to have iK ben n IK he fore time the courts of oC an aim other 8 sae at fit fr r adjudication In view sIeW of ot the 1 use of stenographers as secretaries o It 1 Is lit II important that the Ih cislon clon should houll be e widely wl ly American nn C |