Show BALLINGER INQUIRY ON ONONCE ONONCE ONCE MORE Glavis on Stand f for r Cross- Cross Examination n by Ballinger's Ballingers Ballin- Ballin gers ger's Attorneys Attorney CORRECTIONS MADE IN HIS TESTIMONY First Appearance in Case of Vertrees Vertrees' Ballingers Ballinger's i. i New l ew Lawyer w WASHINGTON ASHINGTON Feb Feu 14 Tile The Tha Bal Bal- Pinchot inger-Pinchot inquiry was wa-s resumed this lorning at 1035 Louis R. R Glavis lavis the principal accuser of Secretary Secre Secre- tary Ballinger Bailinger again took the stand prepared pre pro pared ared for a grilling examination cross by representing attorneys representing the officials of the e interior department Attorneys s Brandeis and Cotton S jilting Glavis and occupying tho the h 11 of prosecutors were opposed by At At- pJ'S s an and Rasch r represent represent- Mr Ballinger er and others of the Inor inor in- in In- In lor or d department Glavis was recalled Mr rr Bran Bran- fe ja announced that there were some lect ons to be b made in iu the record of 19 c witness's testimony Chairman Nel Nel- i suggested th these theae 8 b be put in later but V objected saying ing ho he did not Malt in till the midst of df f his cross examina- examina Jon on to be m met mt t by the statement that f tva Wac a mistake S Gla Glavis is thereupon proceeded to make he C most of the mistakes it 1 having bating ng been due ue to his drawl id d ci His lis His rs rs rs' lisp are always pro- pro AV v. so in ill one of the cord his testimony r read ad There is a reef Glavis declared he heId Sid Id 1 There Thero is approximately etc Jan j Many of the corrections merely had haddo do with U typographical errors is Gla was examined bv by John Ve Ve- es s of Nashville Tenn Toxin attorney for Ballingor Ballinger Mr 1 es ew w from t hp witness the fact that he fide Je de no charges hal ls l's of corruption a against one in ln th the th land and officio office dr 1 in n the tho de de- nt of the interior Glavis Olavis i deif derd det de- de t rd d if ho bo had found evidence e of Or- Or tion h he hp would have taken the mater matto mat mat- er to o a grand rand jury iury instead of to the HI Cn t. t S Ua la la lais is said he thought the facts war war- warthe ted the opinion that Mr Ir Ballinger Ballingor Nr II De Dennett nett had bad acted improperly be charged r d them wit with Avith b ial mis mis- Through a process of J 4 fh lJ i ata of the tho land laud offices and aud tho the de de- of the interior Mr lri- lri tHavis Javis rep repeated the tho statement he ho heul ul ii nude made on direct examination that hEs hE's hE lie s convinced the tho interior department as not in safe hands and that the peo- peo Je's Jes es e's es interests wore were not ot in sa safe han hands sh s. s Whon h 11 the thC luncheon on adjournment wa was ken en Mr trees indicated he would t. t at ir the afternoon session to draw nfl pm Wavis lavis a a. definite statement of r the misconduct of Mr Ballinger and andr fr r r. r Dennett |