| Show mm rIm The agitation for tor an nn extension n jot oC f the thu Chinese f exclusion lon act suggests the question whether a It Japanese exclusion net Is III not as ns much needed na lIS one bar bill barring ring Chinese from entering our shores shore Census Console figures show that th t since 1850 tho the number of ot Chinese residents In this thin country has diminished from train ten len years yearn earll ago ngo to le less s than tItan OOOO now nouv The Japanese however hOIJer are rapidly Increasing ing Illg to the for USO mo there were about 2039 2031 Japs In th the United Staten while the recent census gives gleR their number ns its 1300 and these figures do not Include the Chinese Chinen Japanese In our Pacific Islands In thel were Iere more inure Japanese In the Ha Hawaiian wallan Islands than are now reported for tor the United States It Is In a n well 11 known fact act that Clint Japan Japanese ese so 80 are not aol looked upon Ullon with favor In localities where they the congregate In con considerable numbers Socially they are ostracized But Dut they secure employ employment ment because o satisfied with small mall wages and und sometimes H trouble arises arisen on Oil account of their competition with white labor It there thero Is n a yellow peril now no it comes from froni Japan rather than from coni China Hut a 0 Japanese exclusion net If I different from rant a 1 Chinese one ojie Japan Is in inIn In a II position to retaliate In one WO way tray or another r while China Is not |
