Show GRACE CRAC GUGGENHEIM IM PREPARES TO PRESS SUIT Sill fOR ALIMONY Married Again and So Is Husband but Calls Divorce Divorce Di Di- vorce Fraudulent NEW YORK June 0 The n. The suit started arted 1 in m Chila Chicago o yesterday by Mrs Grace race E. E Guggenheim to annul her divorCe divorce di- di I vorCe oree of 1901 from William Wilham Gu en- en h eim im is taken by New York lawyers as s a step preparatory to the pushing of the ho suit she filed a against Guggenheim in in n this cit city last January for support Mrs Gu Guggenheim enheim brought suit for absolute divorce against the youngest member of the family so prominently identified with tho smelting interests of the he countr country in the supreme court here bere alleging then as now that her Chicago Chicago Chica- Chica go o divorce from Guggenheim was in in- m- m valid alid The plaintiff made no mention of the mount amount of alimony but claimed as the Chica Chicago o divorce was not le legal al she site is still till his wife and therefore is entitled to o alimony She set forth that her marriage to Jules Jults no Roger er Wahl subsequently had bad nothing to do with her rights to sue Gu Guggenheim enheim Incidentally she he asserted that Mr Guggenheims Guggenheim 8 second marria marriage e was invalid Following the introductory ar arguments Justice ustice Gerard adjourned the hearin hearing for or a week eel Mr Ir Gu Guggenheim through throng Counsel asked for an indefinite adjournment adjournment ad- ad that he might take the depositions depositions de- de positions of witnesses abroad Mrs Guggenheim opposed this declaring that hat she was in want When the case ease was called the follow follow- in hog ng week there was no response from either side and there the matter has rested ested until Mrs Irs Gug Guggenheim enheim started her ler annulment case in Chicago yester- yester day lay Judge Honore yesterday in Chicago ordered Gu Guggenheim im and Mrs Guggenheim Guggenheim heim leim to show cause why their divorce secured in this city in 1901 should not note be e set let aside The complainant charges that Guggenheim Guggenheim Guggenheim Gug Gug- genheim and her supposed attorney Louis jouis Werner of New York conspired to o practice a fraud on the court She further urther states that she was given alimony ali ahi- ahi mony of of which her attorney obtained Mrs Guggenheim further avers that it t had bad been blen represented to her that the defendant was the weakest and least important member of the Guggenheim family while in fact the complainant complain Complain- ant aut says he is the ablest of seven brothers brothers and the chief originator anc and business ss head of the great combination of mining and smelting interests She also adds that his personal wealth is more than |