Show Grover Cleveland and David B. B Hill I There was a angUt vague ngUt Impression in the public mind during many years I that some flome kind of natural and Insuperable antagonism antagonism an an- I had arisen between Mr 11 Cleeland Cleveland Cleve e land and David ld B. B Hill Hillas as os the result of the stab ticket in 1888 and the dett defeat at of the presidential electors It was a I matter s seldom mentioned or discussed t by Mr 11 Cleveland In III the Interval between his two terms in the presidency He lie n never f Yde seriously r o regretted c his own I det dett t. t save save- that ho lie occasionally referred to what hi might have done don in matt matters rs of federal taxation and expenditure if he could have hav had another four y years in which to develop develop devel devel- I op his policies In 1906 1900 however the time tub sub jeet came up as a topic of conversation r atlon and for or the first time In my presence he spoke of It with great freedom I 1 want some time he lie said to correct cor cot the false Impress Impression 1011 abroad that 1 I ever hud had any feeling that the time presidential ticket was the victim of oC treachery I Ih in Ne New Nev York ork in the election of or 1888 Nobody Xo- Xo bod body c could uld understand stand better than I how I I that seemingly contradictory result sult was i reached My campaign for re-ele re election re-election was made upon a single le national lo 1 Issue I i ino I le POt ea tJ no so forced t to the f front t tI that t us I had foreseen there thero was no thin tIming thins as evading It even en if I or my party parly had MO so 5 I I l have hae never cease ceased to admire and 1 praise David B. B Hill 1111 for fol or his lila i lean high high- minded administration d ln U of f tI the e affairs rl of I W time the state stale of New York r It k kept down O taxation and was efficient in carrying out the traditional ideas of lila his party and I of our Institutions George Georgo George P. P In I |