Show l r r j J COLORADO COLORDO WINS SUIT I la- la The Success Mining company compan the Colorado Colorado Colorado Col Col- orado Mining company Ernest Williams f orado Jesse J Kight Knight Jacob Evans and V. V Lester Les- Les ter tel Mangum defendants victorious In three suits decisions of which were r r t handed down this this' morning moring by Judge Morse The action several t S 1 f orse acton was brought o Y 1 months n a ago by M. M Kimball fl al George e Curley Cur Cur- Icy ley and George o l' l who h sought to 1 S bave have an accounting of stock which they t- t S claimed to have held In the Success MiS Mining Mi MI- S sing ning company at the time It was taken i S over by time the Colorado company y valc AccordIng Accord Accord- 5 Ing tag to the testimony It I was shown that r the plaintiffs held stock In the Success S company at the time It I was taken overby over 5 by t the Colorado d dc c company a According to toS Ket KesS sS S the Ke testimony it t was shown ow ci that t the theS plaintiffs held stock In the Success com com- S j T pany at the time of the taking over of i J the stock of that company by the other otherS S defendants in the suit sui It I was also shown S that the officers of the company had 5 r agreed at the time of the transfer that S stockholders In the Success company were to t receive a certain number of shares of S tock Stock in the Colorado o o company The de defendants defendants de- de te rs in the action alleged We t that this this'S S 'S S transfer was made with a majority of o the theS S stockholders but that the plaintiffs in the theS S S three suits suit did not avail themselves of the transfer at the time that It was made S S but later brought suit to tC compel an ac accounting accounting ac- ac counting of all al of the stock In the case of the plaintiff Curley the theS S court ordered that the stock which was wasS S held In the name of a Mr Winter be der de- de r to the plaintiff upon his furnish furnish- S 4 Ing an Indemnity bond to rover the amount n of f the stock In the other two twoS S S 5 cases the h j judgment n was In favor of the i defendants |