Show TELLURIDE PLANT APPEALS E DECiSiON I Order to Disputed Make Proof I I I The Power company appeal from the state engineers engineer's I refusal to grant the tho company an Rn mett of oC time to make proof I on the appropriation of ot forty second sec eeC I ond feet of or water from heaver Beaver river which was filed flied early In n I 1918 The rio case uiO will b tried In InI the thc district court of ot D Beaver ver coun- coun I ly I had been made mad by the Vcr power company that thal It would re return re- re turn the tho water valer to the river at nt a a. point bolow below the tIle plant of ot the company com pany HO so that a additional fo for tOI forthe the purpose of ot generating electric energy might b be bo constructed I Beaver Deaver city made mode application ap an- p- p t to u tile tho state late engineer for forthe forthe or I I the forty s second ond feet teet of or water from the thc river below the tho point of the tie I II I plant for th the purpose of ot developing a head of water further further fur fur- Ither ther down stream and after this I w wan waa J filed tho the secretary of ot the power company campan requested further time LIme In which to make c proof and complete completo the project claiming that I had been expended b by the company The Tho state slate en r lne r granted time until October 1 1920 InO but declined to give Ilvo unrestricted time lime setting forth that such extension would tic tie up lip the tho Heaver Beaver river against appropriation ap ap- ap of ot water for tor or power purposes purposes- |