Show AND D PERSONNEl WORLD COURT COURTIN IN DISPUTE Ls 5 at The Hague Are of f Many any Minds on Big Problems HAGUE June Juna 24 By By the Ased Ased Ased As- As I ed Press Whether Press Whether a a. nation log Ing ng a a. case before the world court would have the right to chal- chal the the makeup of tho court and tem tem- lly oust a a. judge who Is a citizen opposing nation was one of the Ions considered by the Jurists who rafting the rules of court for the theof theof of lot nations jurists temporarily postponed the theon theon Son on of ot the method of or the appoint appoint- of ot the judges in order to give time for the rhe Jurists to get to- to outside the sessions and effect promise between the two methods suggested ed namely by Hague tribunal or or by the council Assembly of ot the league of n nations his Is question there Is la considerable ence nee nce of ot opinion decision was reached on the ques- ques of pf the right of challenge as re- re number of ot Judges who are the court Some of the favored challenge and the tem- tem I removal of Judges who were of o the litigating countries thereby ing the size of the court for trials considered It better for the In- In of ot the court not to re- re Jany of ot the Judges but Instead perhaps an extra Judge from a a. litigating to equalize matters opposing e opposing country was already by one of ot Its nationals on u Root favors a a. small court of ot otly bly ly nine Judges adding to this er r from year to year as the busi- busi ef the court Increases Others fa facing farting ta- ta cing th the th court with fifteen or teen members bers |