| Show Nt o IS I SIGhT liy orn Will tIll ho Em J hll l lI Up Ne I York bee dl dispatch tl to Ih from fon London ca 3 Th announcement made In the frOnt fron Washington that tLe Canal treal treaty would outa be font to In Itt tIle Ule ardor of the press presa tn 10 11 1 the ne questIons h by tb Ih There are no cuell cuca from Crom tb Ih both hoth Lord ne Sal l being ln so 10 fir a gre re con on rne and the under not 1101 h t lag allowed to 10 M My dlo botch I affairs The will sot lOt be op kept up by the press lit at an un unu Is u time when ithen the T a holiday And nobody know knon hut hilt slew ll they take tit of the vague nd quality of oC the Davis ent or the precise effects t of the Inte clause the ClAY Cs treaty or of other chanu In I the tOn Two Inference are f I b 11 men In touch wIth lIh the One Is III that the lint Ith Is III better pleased with the amendment ot of the treat than It would ba have been with the tho rejection of oC the and the conse quen reversion to the Iut It cnn can now have bave the final liege of oC examinIng tho amendments and I t ot of either or rejecting them and It II l Ia left In V n more than It would haw have occupied Ir If the had been en altogether at The other Inference Is that Ihal the retention of the Sun Sues rule will 11 enAble the Arn here to con er wIth the forel dike and po t ti effect some lame readjustment or The Th prospect of ma may nt not b ho hopeful but It I Is not outside the rae of Jf Public Ion here hn has been confused by the con taken by the American ena ot of the London pr press and conclusion II I reached rached b by the foreIgn will bl be accepted without dissent enl |