| Show L Olm OSH hionis No ew York Dc Dec liAn answer was made tony today In the suit ault of oC Anton J L DItmar leone J 1 Gould 1 lCd 11 win Gould Howard Gould and Helen HelenM M Gould as trustees uller under the wi will and ot of time the late hate Ja Jay Gould to restrain them train Crom continuing to 11 pay time the COUlt Count and Countess Ie de the mone money of oC tim tho from the estate of DC Ja Jay Gould This de defendants allege tuH that the supreme curt court or of the State hal has 10 no Jurisdiction over overtime time the person ot of the Count or Countess the alt alleged e debtors that th they had neither or of them been served erel wih with the summons In Iii the arlon action and hae have nt not 6 therein anil that the court I is therefore without lion tion to deIde decide the queston question or of how much Is n to tIme the proper support and maintenance ot of the Coon Coun teRN tess mie 11 The defendants also Aleje allege that the plaintiff Is l not t the ral real party interest interested ed d and that tire the assignment ant and transfer to hll him ot of the alleged drafts 1111 amid acceptance and claims and RUNS causes ot of acton action are without consideration ton tion and ohl and that at the time or of said uhl aleglo alleged assignment and tran transfer er erto to 1111 said plaintiff Asher plaintiffs alleged assignor wa was not the owner or holder ot of the said drafs drafts and Acceptances or claims or causes ot of action but hod sold them to Julus Julius Cohen Co bankers ot of London The defendants further claim that the indebtedness Is for tor mer sold sohl to the count and not to the countess and that b by time the IR law or of France where said drafts were a ac 1 and anti also iy 1 tle tIme terms or of a ceton cartain antenuptial agre agree ment time the countess Is 18 not liable for tor the debts of oC her husband huband The defendants I say that a previous Acton action In the same ue ease was AI begun In France Ind and that time the Present suit sut should not nol hold The injunction proceedings In In the theal al see were cale railed before Judge Blanch anI sri today Ma Chlrles Charles A Gallner and It IC ItC C James appeared for Cor time the Gould trus tru trutH trustees tH tees An and Samuel for Cor the plaintiff 01 On request of oC Mr Ir Jale James time the case as ent 01 over until Thursday Mr r hate meyer meer asked if t Ule e agreement JAde made le leCora be before fore Cora Ju tl that the allow allowance ance ot of the ot of 10 A year to eRr should continue This was agreed |
