Show TREATY PROVOKES I T rl I BlO I J l Teller Thinks United States Should Ignore England 1 IV OS B OJ I Secretary 11 le ito MI lii A III up I Il i 1 It t miry hlll rh ROi In 0 I C ne 11 tie t In tine the Senate In executive session plon toay today In connection with the n F I treaty wane w r i iAn 1 An agreement ment on hue mart of at the I Senate to vote on this the amendment it In oferd offered by br the committee 01 on kl Itt Ila relations providing for this the policing ot of m 1 oclo the clI camusi on nel next ot at 3 All Mi orere offered b by Senator Id NI Tuler Teller striking out this pro ro a the fortification o at th the leo I I Nicaragua canal wh when constructed A TIm The of Senator Morgans 8 1 speech A speech 11 by Senator Teller In 11 Opposition tu to the treaty d dAn mis An agreement for a vote on this the corn J J amendment was secured 1 soon I after the Ibe executive Blon session b began an I It WA was reached by unanimous consent at a 5 male IMe b by Lodge Slator Lodge did not uk ask to hass Q a p n ni i date fixed for a vote ote on omi the treaty I It In self lf that the fate or of time the R wi will be determined b time tho i result i of the vote yote on the he lie 1 Senator Teler Teller spoke for about but two hours giving notice of hl his amendment at t t I I beginning of his hll address addre The Tho 1 amendment suggested relates to section hlf I i 7 of Artee 2 or of the trat treaty Af As that ti i etO section now stands I it rods roads al as follows mm No fortifications such be eNle erected cm corn at th the canal cammal or water adjacent n I The United States however 1111 shall be at 11 liberty to maintain such military alona the canal ems AN ia le be necessary tl to II order It against lawlessness And ills mm rr Til The Colorado senators amendment amendment provides for Cor this out Of tine Ule tr sentence Ct if this Ihl and for Ira Venial In Ihl the remainIng POI por lie lon tion I it read a as follows I I The he United States shall hal be at t liberty rc to puch mUt fore alon along so h Its canal a as may he necessary to pro ti der let tact It against anti and duet thi Mr Ir contended if IC the I UnIted Slates desired to 10 built the canal mci It Il should to 10 dl do so 0 tl try ill illing ing t to lur this the consent of Ot ii Britain If 11 10 soil III that Ihal the opinion of at that the abrogation ot of UP tim tr er treats 1 necea Irr sari tie AI a after hr al all was tl opinion of on one man nuan lie he quotel quoted from fromn public documents an anIn In which fornier secretaries of state ru hind had differed in theIr opinions In this I II lie ailo also showed that In some instance there had bel beenu breaches ot of tit the lie He quoted ry F 11 Is a as sayIng that this the iii of C neutrality is II one OM thing it while Ihl tIn is II a anti 11 quit when tIme the canal shall I ho lIe ol opened nel to the ambition and ct f the commercial naton nations I and I is occupied b by Populations ot of md foI allegiance and nd it ht hantis I was wa also quoted on thu Ihl seine mt point II to Senator Morgan Senator TIa t the opInIon that meat never permit tier hr tf if nt action cllon by bythe tint the United ItI States to 10 leal bier to 10 begin In ic I 1 I neue euN her material Inte inter et cit In peat e wih with thi count y II is tot Ino groat but bUl he argued that tl to Ik mak r F assent to io Ih time 1 eon o lon ot of ho canal wu to admit 00 that lint ha lied a right to u ex Jr dissent That he ull said 00 lver old li ie accepted by th tine people I of this country ni niI I |