| Show ANTELOPE OPTION CASE ON TRIAL TRIAL I Judge Cherry hns ha been engaged to today day taking testimony II iii the cl ease ot oh Wiliam William C halt vs John Dir and P T Farnsworth a asuit suit sui II In interpleader brought to compel the defendants to litigate their claim to 1000 0 which Mr Ir lal 1111 nw now heidi bold From the tha pleadings I it appears that Attorney Hall 18 was tr tle under An op opton ton lion on th the Antelope and other min minIng mm Ing claims at for tor 0 At I I ter th tb 11 sole a I question arose aro about abut tl the I Farnsworth negotiated I the gal and claims that McNeil and ad I agre to pay him I fr for hil his labors lie le ph patti Uw roll tn amott of tle tue option to the trustee and I the Ibe later titter to keep back bek tb the S 1 or commissIon and refused to accept te the amount I iii th lb thUG UG and brought suit for tor the cla claton ton Hon of th the de to the O on tl tbt ground that the terms of U te contract under which the lie was wa made hal been n violated Judge 11 HUes fouD found In favor of at I and refused tl to cancel th the deed lii IU bonO ironer suggested Ilat that the four might litIgate the QI ques question tion of the ownership of the te 11 31 Sat ant for tor that purl tile this was wa The defendant istar An answer anwer anti and a j tag 11 that the claim of McNally ad and na Was 8 baseless and claiming th iceo belonged t tj hini for the reason that the had arr agreed to 11 p phim him that amount as 01 commission for or th sale of at the The cae hind nI net concluded it at pr Press a aUr Ur time The YI In Ih the CUs are fOr the lurd We f te md tt PI Piers r Brt Barrette 10 for thu Mr ir hall laU ap ap appears pears peau In his hll own behalf |
