OCR Text |
Show 1 Owner to Keep, His Hard Cidery Court Decides PROVO. Aito. .A. . Plkotad, whe haa been foe the past month In th clutch f th lew In r. garfJs te th sileoed purchasin and having possession sf Intoal. eating iiwr, wes . acouitted Wed need sy in Judoe J. m. Tuck' r'a court and waa given back hta cider. Flkstsd waa arretted about a month aoe on a chsrp of pdrchsaing Intoxicating liauor In the form ef twenty -ene fifty-gaiian fifty-gaiian bareele of cider which an. dec snaiyets tested e.3 per cent alcohol. H waa tried en this charge and wee acouitted. As boss) as his acquittal was an new need h wss re a created an a etarg of having Intoxicating H-uor H-uor In his pee sees ion. The caee wai tried thia week and the lury returned a verdict ef "not guMty Wed need ay. Th ess Is a meet Interesting an, a it decide th pint which ha never been decided before whether, nr th Utah statute and th federal srehisitiofi act, a aereon has a fifnt buy and sett narg cider when th cider Is to b Ued for the psrpsec f making vineasr, Ineemwch as Ptkstsd Is aev airtrted, th law witi be Inter, prated from now en t mean that a parso hss a right f have In hi aaaaa4n or eeil for th pur. pees f making vinegar edt which centain mora sicohd' than the law plaoae aa the minimum for i beveraoea. provide that th par. j tia dealing In thia traffic ar t both holder f vitsagr prm tts from th etsta, I immediately upon his acoulttal, th eider which has been held s evidence wae returhed to Mr. ( Ftkstaa. . i |