Show OASE GASE IS I I II I Court Orders That Thoy Pay Widow Nelson Says NIJI lit Attorneys Attorney Should Ue eel o 11 hr J r The Sup rem court delivered an opinion today tod In the die u case caN that thaI the QI as attorneys roa pay Int into court the sum ot of 17 with S a per cent Interest Intel rom from December U II i for the I u and benefit ot of the widow and ancI children of oC Charl CharI A Nelson within lIa days Iud and to make Ih the payment that thIr names name he be stricken frum rout the roll rollot rollof ot of In the State of It IL will bit be recalled that early last lut May la Attorney P F I William tiled SIted Inthe In the Supreme court sit all rifled by the oath ot of themes Nelson charging David and Lindsay with having violated their duties ILl us attorneys by making a Thomas Nelson qt q Og den dell Mr II Williams WilliAm In a filed at the sum me time ked iced that the ao aa attorneys att be disbarred dl for tor their alle alleged d unprofessIonal The attorneys interposed a Was wa ales an answer The tastier went to Judge 1 I It H to take testImony ID and report he did J found that the contract contrat betWeen Sc Jo r and Thorn Thomas Nelson was III and Ind that the disbarment proceedings had ben been In Instituted by itt In the hope that hI he would force torce the payment anent of the money mone which be claimed was Val due him end and which the Ibe court ourt now orders ord a re refund fund ot of The made mad no and the Iho matter mittel hili ha been Under b by this the Supreme court since lilt last The opinion l f the court wag deity lIell reed by who finds fInd from tile the disclosed ft by the that the accused attorneys rued made a chem contract and thus thul violated their oath ot of office The fact that thoI they hB have for Cor a long time maintained coot good standing before the courts anti Ind Ire are tilen ot of good caused the court to 10 retrain from recommending their absolute disbarment Justice Miner concurs with Justice but Chief Justice while concurring In the judgment of the court holds hold that there should be the infliction ot of punIshment oilier then than this mere payment ot of mon money When say lays lh the chief Justice In an attorney Is II guilty guilt of at deliberately violating the In him by the court end his to iii his client the punish hunt ought to lo be with hi his wrongdoing Tile The dignity of the court lb Ibe of the tho the liesee of the prot protection lIon ot of clients and nd the public good alike tie de mimi this The opinion is II n a lengthy one cover log IDI of typewritten matter I 5 In the case of Dr vs VI Olli S 13 ton the defendant today confessed ju In the lie ThIrd ThiN court for tor And interest t the thc amount sued for tor on n a Promissory note |