Show nil m 1 IS 1 iliS iliST T fuI I 1 it 11 q II fl TL rt I the theIn In t I 01 o I I II hI bli h II H I IJ J 1 I h I III I I I fl Iti In T r I KI a I u II lh Fhe ll f II l I t tU In I 1 II I 1 I th it II hl I in III thu Ihl qt 1 thee t r d i UK hut but ar r tt 1 I 1 halll JI 11 F II fl coin cotTi r 11 i 1 g i I i 11 T III lint It or u n fl t r f the ti rn 1111 lii te tC I ta t tI I I h lu Uon or of thor tho r rI lI H o 0 I I 1 tit hl ayrs were e Of I II It If if hi nee 1111 I U the crIme corn com corns comI I I s t Ih I I I wOl 1111 more moren II n th Ih f justIce nUl flUt It ItI t tS I III le oil h LI 11 wretch S n r 1111 I III I ti I 1 him to ho be their theira Jq a anti uit r I I I XU I n hI i tar It Itric Its 1 ml lon 1 ric I l 1 11 In mar mr be lame In r t f r t to o the r IJ fI till the negro so eo thrust thrustS S 1 rt I t I Hilly the th trial t Il person In tre Ind but that do not Justify tH ot of law In whIch no AD many ot f wore Nor 4 M It Uti hi b conduct of oC the 11 wh for tor portions t f the 1 i ath ot of the urn 1 at al the Huk Tho Tb y of could not r re a than the I trag J iv n AnIlU justice humanity hall hail ne lied 1 when d 11 the ie cowardly masses thirsting for battered Il a In n thc and barn ot of the prison ani dragged their victim forth to his hisa a doom Vo In say cowardly with fuR tull Intent The deed was nothing less It Il was also murder before the la law the fhe C was not convicted ot of nn any Ills His assassins not I nn Ond out ut for tor certain the proofs of oC bs 1119 guilt JulIt or give him n a chance chonce to 10 toI I N r chIs c his Anti And their S C after the tho lynching was III dishonor upon the State to 1111 ii h they belong until Is 18 done by wa way or of their to ate It before the worlO It likely that ono one result rosult wm will wille tie e the tho restorAtion In or of the Catli ath penalty for tor murder and its o tor the deeper crime agaInst the negro We believe l I tP PI should be regarded nil as r nl it and that the he I ont known to the law should be In InI I It t f l 1 In both when or of f less will meet the m I demand less will come tr lr to the divine dIvIno decree In thus reflecting upon the tho r he deed committed b by the Kansas I ri 1 hers wo we are arc not unmindful ot of the lillIS charged to the prisoner nor ot of feelings or of the or of Hut ono one not of alleged hs II 8 brutAlitY tl Iq not loss nor 1101 nIl are Its changed b by other arts of at y whether In retaliation or And the doctrine ot of the Iho sU ot of the tho law must and ought to tob respected In no noton b held up until It Is And lan In theory ton as well liS as IRS Is In hi dut duty bound to hold bIt ble liS as showed In this awful case crimInal dereliction or of dill duty and to trace out the leaders ot of the tho mur IH eroUs US mob and ancl bring them to the bar bard law bo be Let the tho d cf justice maintained nn and l vindicated |