| Show 0 Ti HSI ILL hILL Cleveland Plain Dealer Dalr Time The bi bill which parsed the House b by 0 a lale large li is In Inthe the lie Interest of the dalr dairy farmers and was asked for I by them Is Its object 1 Is not to interfere wih State laws govern lag Ing the Site manufacture and ealo ot of 01 anc margarine but to she give the dairy Inter e ls 1 a protection against fraudulent competition which do doe not now exist In many States The bi bill Is i so framed 8 as to IHn lessen the buren burden no now resting on oleomargarine that bears on ts its ace evidence of oC ls Its character and to place n ft tu tax that will 11 b be practically ter on I it when a as but butter butter New York Journal ot of Commerce I If the Juge passage or of the bi bill through time the House hI has no good tet I it ought at al lesl least tl to dispel l ppl the idea Iden that trusts are potent In the halts hails or legislation The ole tures are the gret great packing housel houses Time men who demanded the Grout bi bill are the tho farmers wll who commonly eom coni I plain or of the WIY way else elM ride rides roughshod over oer them But Dut they on can 1 got get anything they 4 wish from I Philadelphia InquIrer The bi bill when Into 14 law wi will give he the agricultural a protection tion which they ne need and which cnn can cannot not be furnished In fn any other manner I It has hns been said ald that this legislation Is designed to benefit one cIa chase of are r at the expanse of Wee Were that the lIN ease the Inquirer would not hae have been found supporting It it Hut But the statement Is not true Time The ot of the Grout bill I not mot to Injure time the rank mak maker er era of oleomargarine but to prevent them from ram Injuring others b by selling their product under false pretences Indianapolis Newe The he bIl bill passed I 1 by the House deligne designed to protect th the people against olemar garb embodies A wrongful UN us of the taxing power I It is 18 ot of COUII course true Irue that when 1 a asks for butter lie he to tob tobe b be able abl to get et It bot any doubt Ther There be 0 no possibility of selling the imitation fr for the ral real whEt er nt at th the ml or a lower pro price Hut But when It come comes to 10 taxing one Industry and when honestly managed a mate of af existence In order to build up imp another one the lue ease is II dif different t ferent We Ve hive have time ful fullest lt wih with thol those who wish to prevent deceit i And amid fraud Rut nut we very much doubt whether tb the bi bill pUId ran can he P defended I 5 a use ulle or of the taxing n |
