| Show WILL THE TUE APPEAL BE DISMISSED Position M Majors Jors Under Son Sen Sentence tence of Death for Murder of lie tho Attorney to VII Vu Vudor dor der The Tho motion to dismiss s the tho appeal ot of young oung Abe Majors James now under of death for tIm kUHn killing ot 01 1 Captain ot of OJ ten den last came up before the SU Court to today Attorney Cl littoral appeared In behalf or of th the State while Attorney rue lUcy II 11 Jones Jonea the 1110 defendant The Tho matter wu was submitted without argument the court me I being Informed of th attorney generals motion motton And the answer anwer ot of tile the counsel as flied toda today I wn was found guilty of the crime In n 1891 and on the ot of the tho month was sentenced to death ly by Judge The otter nero rae gave notice of oC appeal anti and Oil on the that the ruleS rule of Cu governing the hu not been C with the State Its mod mo to It was WIS contended b by the attorney gen gon oral that the be abstract tiled flied by counsel counselor Cor or Majors on l 1900 OO did not with rule G C or of the court rules that but one copy CIPY or of the abstract was led flied with the tho clerk ot of the Supreme Court when the order required the nl fU In trig of at three that the abstract did not notOn On contain lain tin tan Index or set forth the nt flu lag Ing ot of nn all the I papers In the lower court etc also abo that counsel for tor Majors r hail had not filed with the Supreme Court nor upon the attorney for the State a COP copy of ht his points point antI In the form lonn of a brief nor II a staW meat of the facts necessary ud and for forthe forthe the consIderatIon MIl anti determination ot of the points rell relied lt upon for a severn a for In rule 10 of the Supreme Court MOTION In an affidavit and answer resisting tb the motion to the Ml alJ Altor Attorney ne ney Jones Jonee soft Bett forth U the ot of t condemned man pys va all the work In P the ml record nl en em bUlot kill of f oJ and the rib b on appeal were In t um sum contributed by IMI or of the Thre e typewritten abstracts Josie were lId flied with tb the Supreme Court clerk Five capies III ii till AJI could rouk only be procured on of tUP thi Urn lim limIt It eel mesas to 11 hay the cost of dohr tl work The tInt Om coay CO Y tr for Nr service th the J ral wag n nl l tt last rind Mr Sense JemM he be says tn ti 00 nd the ts aHorn his hll copy lh the retaining ot of one cite or of the tho three court eo U until UI another oat bit be k oft off TIle The GinIon of the Index J Jones eIt OM not regard at aa as asa a or substantIal detect for tor tb the rea reason on that the bo be used the cue se cornea regularly on fill far t st the next term tarm of court In the Interim Sense aake for to the index In conclusion the that the II appeal AI In a ro ens similar limiter to tb the OM at Mil has been with and be says It tan ean It ItI I e be literally rall complied with before the MM ease is III h It mt might t have havo ben been Marti beard th the present term he saye It If the in hav the ease cue ted otI on had bad not been denied b by the chief justie In open court Court The supreme u ourt heart heard ts I to a In the following tM eases C m I er appellant I vs 1 et t iii C K II Thurn 1 Wolstenholme ap nL Uric CIvic l Federation of t SAlt Lake City vs II Silt Salt Lithe appellant ln In the cu case ot of John J P It et ni vs va the SCat Savings Lean IMn anti Company It was U today ordered that the be until the petitions for n a rehearing are disposed ot of Th The petition tit of John Jolin for a 11 writ t at mandate directed ag Jug Sarah Jarob of the judicial district rai a Trial Not Tire damage suit ot of J 1 T et etal t tai al ai u as the heirs or of Charles Chari nur Burss d the taU salt lAirs City Railroad rom company the trial or of which beun before Judge Cherry on FridAY 1 last had Il not t concluded up to A late lato hour this afternoon |
