| Show PROGRESS RESS P MADE IN INTHE INIVE THE IVE BENBROOK CASE Jurors Secured as a a Result of 1110 iO More Mo This Mornings W Have Havea a Spat and Judge HUes Hiles In Interferes Likely to be Secured BefOre rc Court Adjourns Jurors Very Rigid mid and Searching Prosecution Exercises Five and Raised Over the Swearing In of the Defense Bailiffs to Take Charge of the e Impression Pre ails that a Full Jury Will ViII be Obtained by Thursday Night The Attendance Again Large and a Number of Ladies Were Vere at the Session This Afternoon I of the thO tret dya daya e el ek suIt It tt t r III l a jury for tor the tt k II ot Ct Ic the charge u II on fl i sworn and no nc lr w tW jurors 1 ThY far ar Enus L I a at II t J fl 37 eaI of age oge oges s p at al Mill Creek rd an ini d r d William Ger and h has a an ann a n 41 4 ear ot or age mar mari mara Mill Creek at i i ft r TILl only achIeved b by a at Ir t fr of peremptory t four our geL the r while the the beX X I I o 0 Iw t ki a the process v wa rt v j 4 with greater Igor than evor evorg g hlll bi court coert took look n a recess at noon had run It They were Julius COO Cook Cooki I r man Calvin E Stoke II a der clerk The a teamster pcr I L s and the others were no ao not aoI t I tI Cook and Calton being ad Joining Jacklin and rL i wae the result of the thet theS t S work but during the t it Mr r Rodgers ot or th tb ii and County At t In a little e pat at n Inc In f bailiffs out ot or f nine to take charge charKO of ofir ir 1 11 ill S tt lor UP 11 by Judge Ut rub saId ttA If the tho proceeding JI and aM WAS a Aa excepted to h lie tN It ii led ed of c t at once Atter Atler matter consideration Jud Judge brI ni raId there was LI no flO objection C matter was So Bo disposed of R noo t WELL WEIL FILLED 1 were much the same samo th work of a aH H cg g i 1 M n little Interruption b tI of was vas LT r It must have been bra t the routine work In exam eum kt WOUld or of In Inv InA v r A e Interested arrived oar r tl j the t room Was well filled before r ted j The attorneys Hornea on either etther a 4 t t e hAirs on n opposite sides of tlc I fit f uig the JUT jury box boxX X r a or of Burton urton r ia j aM I Th a 1 d 1 tt j PI took be beJ iJ J 1 ir Tr r unI throughout i Mr M ho pro prop p arut rr fr taking tt i arn am tnt court early Ifo He Ifon n fl f from fran the former sent seat e ryr g g r to JUdge Pow low lowr r Ing Ih the jul jury box hoJ I him h lA id who ho carried It aDd q ar r by her herSI herI I SI t I Allen AIen The lad ladles Its 1 U II o 0 In looking LIt e p baty the tho WIS as Inclined to ta bo be e flU ru Tt Th defendants two to toUS e US lk Ii a merchant t J Ue and Smith or r this thu were vere near him himLi Li Mrs In and her heri i r 1 lj T L Pon of rexa oc Ieti alth at ft rear T FEELING 4 i 8 In the case cae began u ar 1 the further examina 4 t t L and anI at the very er outset It ci tl f th h a skIrmish be tt a Ih h Oppeln attorneys a merchant of at Union u u g an 1 married was tak p b taM 1 1 Mr Putnam h rILle of If th session last even I to Attorney he h ba Ad an C noa 81 b tu tb guilt or Innocence t 1 II i this he was chal td but V It by Mr Put eke n Juror that r DO u to the defendants t e great surprise e f know hat chat had red t Ue 10 Q cpI n or of the juror over to 10 this con tt Mr and tiC J I j that the answer of last In ng I did not justify Q t Ir r tb controversy Will was by q lt s p to ao to Stenographer f 1117 u a aal d he had an it it sarcastically Do you withdrAw 1 replied Mr Put Putto PutI I f 10 I lot il to give you the theet 1 et far fair I Mr Ro Bog a Id Senator b Drown Brown kr i bUI to i objected to toI about fairness J I ED nr fly TIlE rim COURT couii It DU rau I o the attorneys tIt tt In re bl I side BIde remarks of oft t Th u Lw t ll to by Senator tInd er to create It q 4 that tha t should Mould not ft fr out the urh a 11 vase aIe as this or of J tl nc W hi EXCUSED J o tai t am his hll I I tor sad and r t Of alwera aa to the tue de It ff uso Itt r d sUe IUS sUek e juror U excused k IU A FIXED OPINION h f 5 tit r n 14 n proPrietor of tho tha milL stated that Lel e u to the hl I guilt or kf t the accused lie was and excused PASSED VOlt OR THE Walter Colton q fJ teamster stated staled t tbt t the ho he was In Deep Cre Creek k when the occurred und and had heard very ery lit little tie about the we case lie He had no opInion as asto asto to guilt or Innocence and was he could gle him n a fair nail Impartial trial Do you ou belong to any secret so clety asked Mr Rogers Yes the Home l Forum orum Belong to any church Yes the Mormon Church Mr Cotton Colton WAS ng passed paned for the tho pres present present ent HAD A mM CONVICTION Winthrop Buck uck formerly n a railroad man arid uld that hi he was on the side of the street the th Cafe when the shooting occurred lie Ho heard all 1111 about the case oue at the time talked with eral people and fOrmed and expressed a strong opinion which he still had He vu 41 ANOThER Ralph Sharkey n a teller at the Dank Bank Dankof of Commerce He hid had formed and amt ox ex pressed flu au lieu It still antI It would affect his verdict he thought Mr Sharkey was allowed to 10 go golIAD HAD NO OPINION Calvin E B Blok n a drug packer for forthe the company compan Will was ill at atthe atthe the time of at the shooting and did not road ad of It or hear It talked about un unItt Itt III some time lie He had no opInion In Iii regard to the Lbs guilt or Inno Innocence cerice cence or of the accused and wal cas passed palled fur the r I hAD lIAP A S I NG OPINION Ernest II hitch a retail butcher hall had read alt all ab abuL ut the CLUe case talk talked of It with ninny p people and formed and ond ex ax pressed art an opinion This opinIon saM said saMIr Mr Ir Rich was WOI unqualifIed nail would re very strong evidence to remove U ii did not think he was In a fit frame ot of mind l to sit alt In the ease Neither dId the court and he was Willi excused AN EPISCOPALIAN Julius Cook a 11 native of Germany had haJ not heard beard anything about this case until he came Into court lIe had lived In Missouri 1 California and Utah anti WAS a decorative painter although at present he was WIUS following mining Aru you a member or af any secret so society society naked asked Mr Rogers None Belong to any church I am a member of the Episcopal church The same church th that t Mr Putnam here I is Il a member of Yes Yea nave Have you met him there J 1 have Would the tha tact fact that this defendant was a gambler In this western country affect you youell Well ell If the profession as you call It n of a rambler gambler Is 19 as high M as that thai of Jure jur I 1 suppose It would not answer created considerable On Mr Cooks statement that ho he WM was entirely unprejudiced he was passed for tor forthe the present OUID NOT DO Thomas n a 14 law had heard hearl or of the case calC discussed It tre f to and had I n unqualified opinIon whIch It would requIre evidence to reo re remove move The challenge to this juror was allowed TO 10 GO Joseph Evans Eans employed at the store had 1 a and settled opinion goIng to the he extent that Morris ns killed b by the and almo as to the reason for forthe the killing or the cau cause e All 1 ot of this would enter Into and affect hIs verdict er The juror however hd had no opinIon opinion Ion as al to tIm actual guilt or Innocence ot of the defendant or of the offense charged lie He rita challenged tor or Implied bias by Mr Mt Ir Putnam In further examining the juror brought out the tact fact that lie he had with Albert Morris about the cue case Ills 1111 opinIon would affect his verdict The pros prosecution cullon then withdrew the objection and Jr r Evans was excused IN THE AFTERNOON In the afternoon Mr Putnam again examined the tho three new jurors left leCt In inthe the box Julius Cook Calvin F E Stokes and Walter Colton All parsed and the court called for tor Peremptory challenges It being with the lowers passed It up and Mr Putnam C Calvin E B Stokes Cook anti CoHon wire were sworn gentlemen were called to till 1111 up the box Joseph I Inight W V I F hilts Re ne n H J Joseph aleph C CLyne Lyne Lne Thomas JoneS I 1 Van anI and Francis N Shelton Judge examined theae gentle gentlemen gentlemen men and Mr r Knight ht was as soon loon as he stated he had formed a strong opinion as to the guilt or Innocence of the I HAP HAD WITh RALEIGH W v F hills former Sailor jailor at the I county Jail slAted that he had heard of the ease cue and read or of it II but had formed no fixed opInIon have you ou talked about the case cale 1 BIlked asked Judge Powers Oh yes at various arlous times timet Was Wat the reply I When dill did you ou last Jut talk of It or h hear hearit r rIt It discussed 1 Veli Raleigh mentioned It II to me t this La morning In court el I I What did bit be say H u What Ito bo see StO how any man any settee could help forming an opinion about the tho case can What dId you replY to html Nothing DId Iou iu tell you that Ii h was n a detec detective tive lI the prose lii In this case rlUe 0 Mr lilli In conclusion Insisted that ho he had rio fixed as to d defend defendants tend ants guilt or Innocence Like all the lie others he could not permit the fact that was a gambler or of It Itself wit self prejudice him nor would be die credit testimony on that account The rh line IIno of If questioning pur mOd by the defense with reference to the wo h that would be given defend defendants ant ants testimony discloses the fact that Is goinG to testify In his own behalf Cahoon Will was defining his po pa on about the same at lie tho timime tIlls this report doted closed I |
