Show UNITARIANS OF DENVER STIRRED Charges Against Revs Rev R RI A AI Ma Manard Mat nard Formerly of Salt Lka l ko koHE lIE HE WAS LONG AGO AG That 0 iSo Entered the ti bitt alou node r It The Tito moe b by some members of the Broadway Temple at Denver and others to 10 blacken tho ti character n it A Maynard lu raIsed the lII iet of n a rb lit that thatch thi ch church all that his persecutors tore tors have been able to rake UI against again him is 13 that In his college das laya he wi moro more or 1 heM wild anti and that att ho waR wa frOm hIs wIts and su aol married hia present wit Ula Tupper Salt Lake people and particularly the members of the Unitarian Society are 1110 tolerably familiar with all these and their estimate ot of Mr r May Maynor Ma nor narda s character Is based upon an Inti mate of oC the man After Mr Ir Maynard bad finished III In the East ut he took in tho Iii practice of oC law antI and won In that thi vocation In Michigan Domestic trou mu bles arose and although the details detail mo or not known here yet el It Is III known that th Mr Maynard procured the divorce and ta tahe lie he wag vaa considered fUll fully justified ARc Arter ARchis hIs marriage with Ula MIIa Ju who wh was In the ministry he engaged In the same SIlme work to It all 1111 the reo re of o his bPs Irn trained ned mind they sue lue tilled filled joint at Reno flen Santa Monica Cal and Grand ilich and the fact noted that ha hariot riot not the of it nn an accusatIon Is I based upon anything Mr tr Maynard Manard has hasI ha haV or V hils haa not ilone one since he tool up min mm I work It nil all seems when elm Im down to he be hailed upon the tho fact fac t that hat ho Is a divorced man Yet It may maybe ma be IC stated that his by his first firs with her hor father tather atLe her ier parents were divorced I and I with him and Popper M until she abe was married from their homeI home homi I In ii this lila city i AT DVER D When ho he went trIm frem SnIt salt Lake to t Dener enver to temporarily nil fill the Pupil Il left eft vacant by tile the lentil of oC Ile on iced ho went to tD n a place co where moro I hn one hitter enemy resided an there here may be come ome connection this his fart fact and th the ent trouble or Of course the Broadway Is l llie tho lie leading Unitarian church ot of Den Denver Dener ver er line end h determined effort Is matte to prevent Mr rr Mary nord ard from the pulpit there 0 0 or TIlE THE TROUBLE LE LER As R to the be of this trouble or r rt 1 bust 0 lit the lie ny In which It oh ob publicity the Denver Dener Post gives following An anonymous coward or set of cow rIn Is Ii attempting to blacken the name nime nimer ot r ne n II A Maynard the new Pastor or r t Temple In the most macat coar lIy manner Imaginable Letters charging the cle clergyman man with ring 1 a cornman and nd with tile me ot of certain crimes in hl nit II or of which hp he has proven himself en Url ore are being circulated nong members r of the congregation The he large majority or of the Tabernacle do not believe Mr May ml Ie hi guilt ot of the base charges They do believe that the attacks uon er Inspired by b louR UI and conscIenceless who do dc rye th the of oC every decent reon In tIme thc community There Iller are a feW fet however who think rough ot of letter Itter to toYe hI Ye a certaIn amount ot of credence t 1 the I charges Ono One of oC those 11 1 Frederick J Stanton un an f at ICIS strett reeL And It a ot of the Tabernacle Mr lr Stanton was time at to of oC the cowardly let letten letri ten ri Most people with an element ot of fair fairly play ly In theIr make up imp would woud have thrown sown way aWay and paId D no at to It Th They would ha have e nt at least Id the larson ho hall been of Iti contents Hut not 0 with Mr Stanton lie the I In his hili pocket and said Mid Arter let awhile he started out on It a still lunt nt to learn what there was wall In tho he foUnd nothing eer r which to balM the air The rho Pot Post then details sub seQuent Luent Acts In springing this ml matter ter at ata a meeting of oC tho ho congregation called to 0 sIder n finances nc Mr Ma Maynards con conduct cont duct t on that aelon pleased d the eon On OnI I gatlon the Post says W and honesty on the I part of the pastor the pillars ot o the church and they Informed him bin himI that the belIeved In hInt him and aud that the divorce In which ho he was fae I concerned was 88 no fault tault ot of hIs hi own j Salt lt Lake people hd h heard of the aI fair too hut but he exonerated of all al blamo there also N CHAnGES The Denver IOs ot of con the following matter Matters In the Temple sif fair narrowed down to allegations and denials Professor l I J Stan SInn ton toil Ite n B Maynards opponent rent the followIng to IIi News last lut night The attacks and falsehoods uttered b by It it A Maynard upon mecan be 1 rov en elm to be false Timbre r never neer was as fin an anonymous let letter ter ot of nn an kind suit to me and I 1 never nevor sold nId there was vas wasI vasI I gave gae the names namN ot of the parties who brought the charges against him to Mr r rH II H I 1 Steele and hll himself PIC U lie admitted the tho truth ot the e that he hAd been a 11 drunkard itt Grand and had committed while un under tier der We the df Ife He also was as charged with b divorced from his first wife ICe and his hilt present one onea a few tew weeks time the divorce These charges with a IIi iii which I dont wish to nome name all app as he admitted to 10 me In a newspaper and Alfo hut a short time a ago o oIn In time the Salt Tribune i In An investigation was had and he heys says ys he was exonerated lIe came clUne to mo me moa a t week when I 1 was vos very bUll busy at the bU and naked US Ine to tor radii r d C bUr bOf and papers PAper I 1 Isaid said to him courteously My Iy dear sir I cauM end them now llO e elen leave len them me and when I have time r I wil 11 look them m over oer or lend them to me th l and I 1 will examIne them at my room lie raid mid lie he did not know Whether r h he would or not notI I replied My ty sir call calland and tO mo me when you ou are II defiant yOU roil dont now net as o n Chris Inn lie He huts never me to look at them slIme I nee n ir i P and Norman know time the who brought the charges The They art are well known gentle gentlemen men of acknowledged worth and In Mr I r Maynard I has ms acknowledged his In the past thou though h until the charges were mentioned to him bun he never said old a word about livIng nt at Grand Uch Mich of his bill unsavory repute Lion but concealed It from everyone Mrs Maynard told me that Mr Ir May Mayhard Ma Maliard hard liard was froni lila his first wife but said nothing about their marriage so 10 soon BOOn after the divorce was granted The Temple whether time the loe of the etc ure true or not cannot afford arrON to till 1111 the chair of the of l n Reed need wIth n a person who thio line has 1 a record so as that of If Mr r Maynard It Ie It hAd not been for tor Mr attempt to capture the tern tem pic ile rl pastorate forcing the l sue anti de 4 that he bt be called to the per p r manent chair Ul charges would lever naver hare been known for tor he be beall all tw 11 cit I m makIng kl ii an f e i keeping It ItI I the c for Cor hiI bI nd to his I TO CONDONE Now ow it has e public property and n a public scandal Candal we cannot afford to permanently engage n a reformed drunkard or n a prodigal son fUn He has ne ac i the part ot of the I charges and asked that the lad might be condoned It if he had been courteous and kind and met thos tho charleS charges which lie he admits to he true truO In It a ChristiAn ChristiAnI I spirit and It had not become public I property thy they might have hare been but no now It I Is not possible The m meeting on wa na SHod called b by his of hh hI friends only antI were wera cut upon me mehence hence I 1 said In Iii ren terms wIthout naming them specifIcally that charges Wore Were made inside against t him him and pending Investigation Inn In hopes to spare him My f action nn and my silence was WaB for the purpose o ot of hiS reputation tation from the gaze Enz It If Mr Maynard Manard Is n a ChristiAn gentleman he admit time the truth of my Mr Maynard I rd was wat Invited by rn Inc itt at his hili u request to hold haM services s at the liros way Temple during the month of No I introduced him to time the HI It of Iowa a most worthy won gentilman who wished to hold hola two or probatIonary services HI like Mr I I hereby t I Ir to allow Mr tr Wing to next Sunda But Dut these theu a revolutionary proceedings ha liNn taken for tor the of ort ott Mr Ir WIng anil through the th m lum 0 of n a few indiscreet friends ot of Ills WI IC Uti pushed matters to an t nil us to till th rea reason cm to be why h ht he has not been to the Permanent charge of the WO DI TilE STATE I 1 have no ot of any real iette mentioned In the last lut edItion edith ot of the Post No anonymous have ha over liver been received 11 by m rat The stat meat ment t a an UttEr unqualified Inexcusable able on th ha part lurt of It Ii J Maynard II lie acknowledges that 11 lie lieU Is Isn U n drunkard and time the wily Temple Tempi afford and will not n cab cati bUn to the Tile The have been be n thin from the week of oC his IW week until on a personal 11 appe I ell I http made b I me mc last Sunday Sunda for tor hl Ii the receipts receipt were double what wh tilt thE the treek ek before tor It it is a return COI or 11 m to him thUI thu by Innuendo n nd tl carefully worded ii In to cast odium upon rut action lie He forced forcell me to ic whit I did In may own defense Mr II II H 1 Steele of mitre treet and Alexander Peters anti Nor No the buildIng can canIO en IO beyond a shadow of lC It a doubt tin tha t the th of nn an anonymous lathis letter lath letterIs Is ly false and that It was waR no r attack by any one on Ip a few days It a COpy cus of oC the tho with the charges In full tull will be tur tui to the dally daily ai Jon roon a ait as asIt It arrives ImPLY OP 01 HEV MR m MAYNARD MAYNARDI I tb not care to make any ry I to auth arm an Itta k said He Mr Maynar e carefully ull reading the lie lion Uon o Mr r Stanton The ah o no to attack til th we ot of time the assocIation and It I Iwas was dU dIfficult to secure a lon of 0 the ch These is nothing I woul tre to ae say he remarked I shows showed Cf Ir evidence h thee are not true anti I 4 aM ch the atack of Mr of l notice Nor can I 1 any my motivo to such ther than that the author i feln tears that lbs tb ro Ii I an fn effort being mack as C ii h hAr Ar lays to 0 the end and him Cr from his hlA positIon as aa trustee Were I tl hi m kl S a statement Mr Mra a J 1 suld pronounce the that n false TIro There ire at a l o of fact In I It but bUl In eve ver It Is untrue I deny d PY having tel any o obe of be charges t referred to b by Mr r Stanton tl T o the I to them I 1 never r ac and I It would not l b truth truit that I 1 am a I tor or me Ie to say y or that I was wal ever arrested I Ifo er a misdemeanor I 1 and do dc fo dmit I that before I entered the minis admi I I In a glass glasst Iau ot tl t liquor bu but I 1 wa Ier never arrested fr for ny fly crime In m my life Ufe It l r did I Off over ay any misdeed under the or I liquor liquorI I never have lale ay any ata attack k uns to Stanton continued the minister r rI I f explained that list h he had pored t se A may I Crl Ind and that thaI o as such I mistook him I until n he rp roce In the meeting Sunday amI nil said hl that were pendIng Ij mt me WAS ON O A CARD CAD There mere It II n a great variance In his or his hll opinions If lie he believes UeN it thee there WI no anonymous letter leUel lettera In a tl tIie a at l lie Steele lie he told toldie mt ie that tl tIle the chata hames was II received b by him In on an on ln elope containIng a written card heir Ins ig no Still SUH he may think at this hula Is not an I have asked aled to see Ie this card 1 wh very err much to I ace I it S So ds Ir St Steele h but Mr Stanton has not shown Iowa i it to 0 eIther r of us saying lie he not find n it tt It wal was Mr Ir Steele who demAnded at tho ho chale charges should be made known to me lied Had It not been tor or him I doubt it If I 1 should have hao known klon out them until Mr Stanton abut them eni known know I In the tho meeting lie He hen ho communicated them to me In Inthe inIe the Ie pretence or of Mr Ir Steele that Mr Alexander eters would them em HE He sa s now that Mr Pettis cold oula these he told me mt r I asked aske hint him if IC he hac had haden en Mr rr Peters lie Ho saul hl he had not lallo P lIed on the gentleman enteman In ant anthe and andI he I bid me that he had not fn seen Mr Stanton Anton Mr Ir Peters said that lie he knew no charges that hI lie hind had none to 0 alte and knew ot at nothing the tact Ct after atter my a news per rat appeared criticising me mt I It Is in false that I have hae ao cod condoning fO for lY past Ir ills rl ye led Mr Maynard B as hl he head nad ad this statement or of Mr Stanton I IVO hae VO nothing to be of f and I Ido do not hot nor ha I 1 ever eer asked tor or an any My h friend Mr Jr Steele told me 3 plainly that a denial Crom rant me was wa ni II lie asked but I insIsted to him bat I 0 be glen given nn an opportunity to secure ute prof ri ts and times the I have produced The Th I In m my Possession are are still mm clent at to 10 prove ro about 1 nimy char her or m my past nd that anyone wished to kno |