| Show w It I appear tobe to le by few J proper for tor ere eec or church paper to t Representative the In from Utah and to assail pf of Jesus of Saini alnIs of at Which he I 10 a but decidedly mhd rong for tor the Deseret News to sn say anything In rebuttal ot of the charges chargee that are the News Is 18 the Church organ We VI have hao hail had to remind our Ir Irrational Irrational rational critics that thIs Is I nice n a new with opinion subJect that Inte Interest st the and ond that relate relaCe to the public welfare DUI But their objections obJection do donot not floe matter We or ON well that I there thero ore and which would like to the Deseret News New i nad are Quito angry because or of their that What tile they ma may say or do Is not worth while I Ito to dwelt upon i iThe The Th position now flAw taken talen by nearly Carly all the Influential of the country without regard to this rhes far tor above any party part QU hat hatan flu an been upon Mr Ir Roberto Robert ana upon the State ot of Utah because the Houle ot of had no con constitutional right to hIm from the oath ot of I and the seat eat to which he WIlS waB duly I elected and which wa was not contested by any ny claImant fur tor the tho place Such pa pert fler as do not coincide tile view are arc unable to off r anything by wa way ot of legal nr lmont or precedent to justify the ot of n a ot o Wh who has the constitutional and sla statu statutory tu tory It Is II trUe that r Tayler In Ing tn to gl for Mr exclusion cited the opinion ot of now 11 or of t th ap J ot of the Supreme C COurt urt or of th the W vo when on th the ot of N w York State Slate het th rho pro ot of the dd l tor fo WIS nOt nM x u l and did not bar he LegIsla LegIslature ture tUr from imposing neW ne reasonable ble and nn proper Also Allo that Mr Tayler Quoted from Chief Justice Marshall the minion that lie would he chArled with Insanity Who would ouli contend that the tho L nIght might not to 10 the oath dIrected by the thelon lon tIt such other othel oath ot of us 1111 Its wisdom mIGht hut what ha either ot of th to o odo do with th the vase case In consideration It to Is not dIsputed that Co s has the Ower to certain tor or its Ita members other than already BUlls flut body In Insane sane enough to tD claim that when n a member dul duly and posse i All the tho lIon already by In law presents himself to take tho oath ot of now nOI Qualifications can be sprung upon uvon him to satisfy the cia In mor of oC the multItude and haVing no legal reo While It tuO may be portee perfectly II for or the house ot tives tIu to dul duly enact new provisions In reference to 10 membership in that bOdy bOdyE E such ch new MW e adopt Ca 1 except In r I form and procedure and he be mad hIld cotro active acUe And no such lIuch added lions have yet et been not the citations by Mr Taylor It If at til th bar be denounced by lawyers tt R pettifog And ore are the they any better when In a public journal us ox for COr shutting out n duly elected Member ot of Congress and thus thull denying a 11 sovereign State Stall its lis rt right ht of representation en tation the C and ox ex lating laws of the States It II I for any one to attempt to dispute the fact that In the c course pur pursued sued sUld against the Congressman from Utah tah his hll constitutional und legal rIghts nM and tho those of the State elected him 1110 been n grossly and indecently trampled upon from a 11 craven fear ot of pular fur fury Jt II Is II vain an to deny th hO equally patent fact that the tho noise nolle ot of the started from tile the see tIC tarlan preachers and their organ In thIs elli In mallee chagrIn and to I It If thu bit I Is to eIther the or lr the J or both bothwe I Ie we e help hell It and It lOell ioe not worry 11 If 11 Ill li It II only one mere p lf evIdence that when hen th tb 1 tuk tb lb majority ot of oft t p ri fl of UI Utah 1 either etther tr fi m r or er II a 1 stend nd s i c 1 rj to eren temper tempera a tI t y ha to SO go Outside the b al 1 c troth precedent antI and cottI jl aw |
