| Show WhAT I Referring to the Implied ch rge by bya a well ell known Judge judS of the Supreme Court th that t the Tribune Is ii guilty guilt of oC falsehood In makIng unproved and Un provable charges against the Mor Morman mon man authorities that paper In re ie rebuttal otters offers the alleged argument that ve If could make no such n a charge It was true Irue without beIng over our whelmed by libel suite suit The toree foree ot of thIs kind or of r iNtoning wit will be easily 1811 felt whon It is II tiered berd thAt the Tribune ed a along 1 long lOllS list of names S of wham It accused ot of Jl polygamy or polygamous relatIons relation which proved cJ to 1 it gross lib libel upon them wIthout th the slightest excuse for Its Ita publication an yet et not nota a single libel suIt was entered against that It a 11 crIminal charge of at libel l had bat been entered and pressed for tor scandalous attack upon individuals without cause e made b by that sheet 1 It would take several ordinary lIves Uns to serve out the penalties that be imposed Impaled under the laws Iwa against libel ont and slander The Tribunes Is I as faulty and unreliable as Its reckless Ions perpetually repeated against the authorities and the Mor or ormon mon men people |