Show TAXES UN butting Abutting Property Is s Not L When Assessable for Improvements Ol OF COURT LIU O riot tUI 1111 41 l TaX ne ll It Lake I Ind tate State Ih provides for Cor the theu ta a vf Im Of oC the cost Of oC Int u 1 tho abut v regard to tot hoth r has wen been beno it t 1 It t t r sul bAs hu wn b on ty by jugo CI tt lie do de der of oC the C court Blk method ot of milking ns a that tho th jt r now such r Ia Is 15 un gue liP lA This decision was SWaB ren ien renI t ot of James Jamell Charlea cage In tae and the tho War Var ot of I tb citY laving company IIA ago tho tha court granted a 11 fr Ern Injunction the same them from proceed lib Ih the Judge L j the thu demurrer to totI on wall wa rs 1 for Cor want of oC fact suiT suIl tI ft a cause caUs of oC action O hia rull ruling I virtually to the effect law Is Ia Ihl Nt t It pM Ides for far the taking of propertY for Cor uses USei without Itt ill compensation and without I roceS of low law It Is In line Uno with witha ct ted by the Supreme I a rt t ot r the States over oer Ii a year cur j 4 wherein the 14 I Rn an Ohio case cas Ir i were raIsed It ft wall wa held jane ot of properly thea h the for tr public ments could nut be made mado according to it giUy but that the bene benefit t to be dens derl d dU If age the tho basis of at U II the hI rop should hould be mInt l J t r this ruling the tho Durett law pro Jj for the of cuata of at Im Is aJ Ind It may seriously affect the mak tt tr f Im improvements In this this |