| Show MCOOHTAHui E II Chief Juslicn Zane Delivers in Opinion In the Case of HamnernBlochiCo MRS SARAH E PETERS SUES FOR DIVORCE r to tenrr In Nult nln Ib Saw r nooO Chief Jusllce Zane delivered an today concurred In by Jui jtlnlon Y Jl H l > > V > vv 11 Jortch M JUltie n mca m-ca 01 John 1I0mner I II 1 II10rh ond compon IInt affirming 110 10 cour 1110 JudJmnl ot the coI The recorJ In the eBOe how JIoeh and ompany gt ju gmenl golnt the nlm ot lIIckbun nd jmpuny Ir 1362 tho an xecutlon Iu ulna the Indh Idual rnmL i of the IIrm 01 lilac urn nd eomlny IIma Iolng n nnd tht Ihc otll tr ond uwn he Indlvld ual propi rty of 1I0mncr The IUr hn conuOlnc1 ctlon noln Ihe I n Ict Jtlce 1 the oellte lor aud go Judgmen rnr tho 1IIun selied A slmllal Judgmnt iihnl In Ihe dltrlct curt bu he ae was reversed by II he court ihlell held that the 11 w goln1 lImner a w1I a hi com 0 and w Inlr on 11 Ice Whn Ihe case reached Ihe district court agiln the complaint wan amended < amend-ed hy 1 < making n K 1 Illoch and com n dclndonlB and on the trial 1M uh u 11 non n u tlon a to 110 o1l1eer moklng 10 Counsel tor IIoch and comlOn hn niouil to dlm UI the roun1 that the otuntur > dismissal ad 10 the onl > dfcndanl In the Jullci courl deprived the dlntrlcl court of Jurlsdlc tIn to try the case It wan not denlu that the district court had authorltj 0 lIIrn1 the comrolalnt or tht the drndon Dloeh n ollllnny dl1 not voluntnllIy It w contn < 1 I hat the nrllIetln 01 10 dltrlot eourt dnde1 Ill > on the urldlctlon 01 the uII onrt fh Supremo onr nnd lhot 101 pollIon wpull1 h ben nrrcl ho1 her hn a Int 01 urlsdlctlon 01 tho uhJec lIIalle 01 the ult In the tu tlccs court When snvs the court the subject mutter of tho milt In I not within the lurlndlctlon of the Justice It li I not within the jurisdiction of the district oourt on al peal 1 |
