Show 1 Hi SHARES IN A MINE 0j I I I Coilrolllig Interest In the Omalia 1 k I I I In l fDlspulep I 1 I I 1k I p i 4 4 i t CASE SlI1IWu1T CbMi4iCATEV 11 1 1 I t 2 L 1 11 I I I Judge Illlo llarlnglli C nlrov4ray I I toprfn tunrl ADlrnn IxmTr 4 Cuun lu a llnunige Suit I i i I i Involving I A somewhat oomplolel case j volving the Ownership of 179300 abates of ibe capital Block ot tile Il Omaha Mining company Whose pror arty 1 In I situated on the Wail Dp In tile 11 I Mercur districts came on lor hearing bifjre Judge lilies today Walker I I I Broi ban tiers am the P131 all fit and i Bluuu Bamberger W B Fdiate 11 and II It Walker Jr defendants The complaint alleges that on fill I I 11 Sltt day of October 1890 the defendant I defend-ant Futato t and others deposited with plalnllfl 170300 iharei of the capital dock of the Omaha Missing company I t Under the terms and conditions of a 0 certain cow agreement tbe ebarea were to be kept and held by 1 a In lift 1 r as dpolloI I 00 the thof November 1890 II It I 1 I alleged J HAValker Jr BlaJ with Ihij I 41 plalutllli a contract between Fugale 1 and Ili met If Walker Jr claiming that k he had auiceeded lo the rights ol I I Fghtsedin the bare q I It ll I then eat folttl that on i the 14tb of November J R 4 I SYalker Jr pl ld plaintiff a bum i j money tile amount called for In I the escrow agreemeatwbich was placed to Ibo credit 10 the several fatties lu the I I aireementjand the stock WAS forced i over to Mr Walker The next day It li I alleged I Fugate and Bambdrger tendered a j gum called for lu ibeeaorow agrrtmenl I 11 and made II demand for Iba stockundi ran z I r-an Alleged tranalar mdu by Fugata to I Bambarger The tock was raturnaj I to rMnllfli by J B Walker Jr and I 11 la now bald by them t I I lilt admltiaJ by plaintiffs that they I i have no claim upon the property and I I they also lay they are willing to de I pout the tuck lu court or deliver to such paraon or persons an the court I shall direct 1 t Plaintiffs pray that defendants be 11 remained from taklcir any proceeding I proceed-ing agalnat tom cord that each dt I fendaul be required to luterplead tot to-t I gatber concerning their ethics anu I If that they be ulsuuarged from all llabll F Iy la the matter I The deleudant J B Walker Jr I I flies an anawer and cioiicomplalot I and alleges that ba paid three and tutjUve hundredths centt per share i I for the stack which amounted lo I 6614 45 which wai In 1 acojidinoa I t With tiiaatcr w agreement It providing I provid-ing that II said amount was paid be love November 23 b UB3 the plaintiffs plain-tiffs iboul Urllver tile tuck lu Funatt I I otMraarand that the plejnliili ibould I I place the money to the credit ol The arllealuureaitd t Defendants Rawls ors ger and Fugate I or-s also answer danjlng plalntitlaallaga I tlonl and also allaying feet the plain j i till Jn Walker and defendant J 11 I Walker Jr are lather and ion aud I I I that they bad oontplred and confer 1 alad together lor toe purpose of de fraudlog the deleudanli It la I oleo alleged by defendant I Bambenar and Fugale that the action I was brought LO other purpose than I J to enable the plalntllla and J It I I Walktr Jr to retain possession of the 1 certificate ol ilookpending Ibo development Pf devel-opment of the minit g property aud In odor that they may embarraa the de it fends old lutheir ownership and con feel hit tile lather and uu may profit pro-fit thereby t Tba defendanta Bamberger and Fu gate also file an answer and Croat complaint to the croascimplalnt oi J B I Walker Jr denyIng deny-Ing everything and making practically Ibe lame allegatloua and storming that by rxtou ur the wrongful acts f of 1 The Walkera thai Ihrr htvabton damaged In the aura i > < 50 000 for which am In tit thy I ask uj < meiil ant tuon otber relief ai fully to the court teem tipllable The plaint fls then come along again anti auaw drfnd ta I Crisis co plaint denying that Btnibrr ml coca l 9 la t cir kiuwl dga or belief be-lief i ver bad any tereit lu IbO certl firials 01110k D eudant J 11 Walker Jr oho summers delendauti cresromiltl to leiiylog each Tile every alleg ilon Bevrral witnesses wire examined lojay 111 U thought that the case will not be conclude for vr1 l Libya lo o ma rise attorneys In the case are Bamual tlcUowall for platml < Baunett Hark too Howt aid JlraJIry a d Dickto Ciln OLd Dills lor date d anti J It Walker Jr and U Hot H-ot ohlow and Brown suit Ueuderaou or Bambtrgtr and Fugate |