Show L9 I I ATTI1E POINTOF A GeN J I I I i I I 1 i i t Mrs McDonald A Recital 1 of Her Husbands Treatment If 11 > I Treat-ment of VerA I I I I 6 I A VERDICT IN TilE BARNETT CASE i 01 IxfiniUnt I otind CJnlltr of Common An I Q t Co I I Othelce1t 3tt I 1 I I I Emmfi McDonald has filed a suit for I I dlvoicn In the Third district court 1 against her husband cargo McDonald I I McDon-ald The parties were Intermarried 0 nt Adcl town In April I8S8 The complaint I com-plaint alleges that 31cDonald Is a map of ungovernable temper durIng I I fits of which he Is accustomed to cruel I treatment towards hid wife In 1892 at n while residing I at Spanish Kork Airs i I McDomM says ho I compelled her to q I aft In o chair until midnight at the I d I 11 point of a revolver This was at a I time plaintiff says when she was disabled dis-abled by an accident so that she could 9 not walk During the same year It Is I Jt set UB McDonald ordered his wife out 1 of bed 1 and to leave the house nt the Kametlme threatening her life with n i carving knife MXRunald U I also I I charged with having lice kicked his 4 wife In this city Injuring her arm and I pptne and causing her Intense pain I I and suffellng On the 24th of last month Mrs McDonald say defendant I V defend-ant cursed her and told her to GO and I I I get a dlvorco and that If she didnt I I I he would On Ausist ZOth he Is I again said to have mle the same talk but I I adding that ho would kill her At this ih I time lrlonal1 locked the doors cm pelllng MM McDonald to zVeorn II I I the howe with him while he wore nl l I I I her and threatened her There are no I I I I children Mr McDonald prays far 11 ire costs of suit and 10 attorneys j I farWIley WIIy L Brown Is the plalntlffi I attorney |