| Show LILY WILL 31AICICY In IN rdillug it lok VS lit California Alut Thnhh i y San Francisco Sept 2IThe air c noUlicement that Mrs 111Y Langtry iv 111 marry Prince Escrhazy Is I confirmed firmed Irmc Attorney I C McPIke of this city Is authority for the announcement which la to be taken In connection with the statemeirts perslslenlly and repeatedly published since I she secured I se-cured her divorce In May lout as tc Mrs Langtrys respective I marriage this distinguished head of an anclenl family I have recelvod word said Air Mdlke from my client Mrs Ijinctry of her Intention to returrr te California by the end of Xneinber The prince will accoinpany hr and Immediately upon their arrival hr tho will he morrd In Lake county I presume for her home lit I there Illecatem they have preferred to Ile I married In this Plate II must not lie argued that either Mrs Inntry or Prince Ustorhazy regartim the tormer Irlno rtrhoy Rio I divorce an lacking In legal ty In any I other jurisdiction On the contrary I licy are advised 13 their solicitors In London that the deep granted at Inkeprt han freed her Absolutely from I Edward Langtry n that she mol chooe more In I any part 01 the world II she |