| Show MiurviiKH AMI UN 111111 On Id lay last the liter of Ihe Rio arcunto Cat flee wa fined 5MfJr conltnlp ol court with a proYlstottat mprlionmoat oue day tot each 2ol liar The occiilon ot the trouble wit he report ol a divorce Irlil ubllihed 10 lbs Her Tht attorney for out of he pirllei lu the case called JuJfio Catllni attention to It iiylng that bo article wti 13 unwarranltd that lie lrouht It 1 10 Iho notice 01 I the court that the latter llicujd l say from Hit bench lint It 1 Le livci It la U this and unnarranled The Court till 110 then the lies snorted that In 1llmnl were true and that I Ibo alloray end Judge hoer It 1 Slat this Tiry moment when they uoboil atlugly ihamclciily and briienly eclarel It 1 lob a gross labrloation e Then Hit contempt procttJIugi were nillluted The action of Itse oiurl In this case ijuil Ibo oppoilte of that taken by the few York court of appeai relernJ ton to-n the > iEH a short limn llnce and ai we viewed Ibo New YOlk cote la le a ronilitect jrocojurc we mutt retard the Sicraminto date Bttbootpoillr Under Ibo New York rule the remedy for Ihe attorney lalmed tubs wronged was In criminal or civil proccoJIiue for libel or both 115 also had the privilege at aiklug the o url to say what It did Lu when that cturt rocecded to lake up I Ibo CIIIIEh II bid 11111 liable to the newspaper rlllolim There was 00 contenit ot court In tht tuilntu II a court rut there must 110 01 the lodge who would Iltub Hatter In the form In which It t Ill and proceed n war done In hit ell In our view Ihe Roper procedure vm ai the New York court lays II 1 down lot isle j who crltlolici n nowipapur and In return li cfjllcliid lwb05l 16awesalyt hac slot 5a course In proceedings before himself ai Judge If bo U wronged lie tin nil remedy In proceedIngs for III el civil and criminal The oUenie not le IrK committed In lilt preicrict aud not befog dliobtdlence of I rtgulir and awful order ot court lira Judge who goes uutld of tbli line and Ly coil Insult roceodlnct seek lo oilabltih lilt own veracity It 1 bathe inludi of many people pretty near to what Judge Jallln std It 1 would Le It hi did not take such a count loo contemitlble to be lira lut cct of contempt The Bacramento method of tdmlnliltrlng uouteuipt aw glvct opiorlunlty for too much tbllll tt I arbitrary and opprenlve |
