| Show COLLETT MUST GO TO PRISON Supreme Court Decision In a Spanish Span-ish Fork Case I LOWER CUM UFUlm Innll or I ntldowe o 011104evor 1 I a I 111 1 0 rt1111511111 Thoo Buprtfna mrt dellvrd in opinion opin-ion today In the cat of the Rial vi Irving Colt appellant affirming the jii Igmenl 01 Hit Ill court Colllt mm Informed against by the country altoeney 1 of Utah county for Hit erlm at fornication rommHtrl with One UMMf Hecketrom ft young woman who WM worMni aa a oervnnt Itlrl in the family ot lefendanta Distort AIM 1 Wi lbjon at flpnlh fork Lolltt was convicted but April br a jury anti enlencd by JuAg pMrnberry to thre month In the lUh rituals Jill Lolllt pedaled and th point ri led upon O a reversal 1 wait that the leitlmony of the complaining wltneoi who wnl upon th wllnee eland with a ohlll 9108111 hlcb he aal I waa CullI was wit CmwrIoraW br other a Idenm n OInlu I counsel for 1111 Was that It the CrIfilt WAS om mile I 111 girt 1 wism equally guilty Sib the defendant and that ht losing true she became a accomplice who teetlmony th law require to IK r rob rated < Chill Justice llrtrh who delivered the opinion rfra to the came if Ills Stage va II pioneer wherein It wa hU by Justice Minor that the ililul In question did not require certain wit newea to be corroborated In I reipect 10 every material fact but only In r1r Store I 10 such Of the material facts A constitute a necessary figment In I the crime harged Th court find that Colllt goole linn was not In violation nf the Statute The oul further audit that hn the MITI a fain Rkelolsell ColU 01 having uln1 him daughter the doIMnl d1 net dJ Ih charge but IwI Bit rallied the INlol of the child n1 oxftwevI a willIngtises 10 plarrit the young wanton In if face 01 ouch evidence the court malrit it In morilly folly far coun owl to contend In behalf of the 111on I that there to I n corroborative evidence and thai therefor the conviction was unlawful There la I nothing In the recant to Juitlfr a rcverml The Judg Jutift r Jlll mnt Is I oilliiied justices Mlnr aM Itaikln concur 111 UMjILII Co ul Ash CUIly I t Aleu1 o gotrdAy The curt of Tom Ash VI John Connelly the trial i if which began lie fore Judge lllln yesterday morning reached a conclusion this nand n-and Halunlay woo ct down lilt the hearing of nrgumenl The parllm la the Suit nr residents of Firm elrect between U n N irtreete Twenty Brit ward A largo I num her of wllnc e molly neighbor wer examined 1 o Wth We n li le tlmoay C how < IfleeilMene of eoneld erable I Irlh fel doT etwoefi th litigant Aft > aued 11 recover JOO d llniut and kN ti Josef Ih defendant Connelly enj lne1 from maintaining a nuManco coneletlnic tit A Asia water p1pe from which dirty water flowed on to lila land flooding his ground and cellar Connelly denied the allrKitlin made by Ah and In a cro coniplalnl Stoked that he be given SAW aliening that Ihe plaintiff ullt a new houee adjoining him and PO constructed a chimney that th moke entered hH upotilra window catulce 1 him great nol and I Inconvenience In-convenience la I I damiuro In the gum of JIM ntu men IN MRANTiur 111 Caiaor lllnivi Illue Ooe Over foe Term using 1 0 1tu at nTh n-Th lvoo COM of Kitty A IttM Appellant V Ituesell II Illrw on ap prill 1 from the Kxirlh district court cam up ticforo the Bupromo court to lay but upon It belne stated that the rapandolit West flow dead a el pnl th term IRAQ granted The east waa heard bolor Judge I > 1 eent < rry last October when the re eputioent wan given a I Pierce of divorce I on hU cr MooinplalnL Urn nine wed for fetwvrat maintenance which Was denied She charged her hurinnd With dot h gruM cruelly but the court found otherwise Alm 1111 is I well known In PrOM wherv the deoeaM1 I to paid to haw a Scrota catatc sap cavort Co The Ruprema court disposed ot the wur Tl lupr following caaca lodayl O H name V A Von ration 01 aft ap tllantoi lubmllted on briefs obmlil o Aron Oyo vi B it ollock spy of Itt Untl argued nnd taken under advise Client Alvlnis U Snow appellant vi John T Illchl motion to dlimlii denied and case continued for the term Trial M ait 13Alklm 1 Bell The Injunction I Salt Of T M IObt vs lJorman Notpac cam an for trial Iterate Judge Jilles I this afternoon with Attorney W U Ilutchlnaon for the plalllllfl and Judge Boyd for the doTh ln4nL Th suit was brought by Plaintiff to 111viont dtndlt front undermining ullnK dlniilcm lowing tit Client InK a spring I Ulonrlnif to tlalnllrf and known aa lllilyi I PT901nSho I Jordan Narrow b low Lamvon 1 ower plant AsTnl DIVII11CW tAr nluo Ihl 101 HprllI Oaildy of Chl1 V1111dd This afternoon Judge mien granted a dlvoro lo Martha A Armstrong trun tAvanda it Armstrong n former attorney Lla AI legally of this clly on tile ground ot falluru r support ken ArrrurtrolB was Vim Awarded IWO alimony but tits custody if an eight I yearold boy tits du Uiff wrier took under Jvbwnicnl until Bat urday 1 Mntlft testified that she married ton to-n In An Lolo In 1IJO and that for the join t two years Krm I lronij find felted l to c ntrlbute anything Iowa 0 words her irupp rt 111 I Wall ali 1 > br ught out thai Arm tranff left the rlty about a month ago while Mr Annntronu Wag visit 10 frlenda In the Ilait laklig 110 him the little boy HIt them nothing has HI-t en heard cf tither Whn lite wlf Mir1 to diver An fdrseu 10ImI that he Old milk a contest And lot tiornigh his lo 110116 flotblain spot Win in lie n i a 31 answer denylror Mr ArmMrona nJle derollng nations He aa not reprmc R by c unnel 1 this Afternoon Judge Ijauf I I buurcnv appeurd the the plaintiff No on 141go W A Ck Ie Urlhr of 111 nil A mutt 11nl P A I Franklin In III Third district mutt today to rit my SIA904 alleged 10 bo duo on Iwo Iml ry notes M V Moan Illod to suit Unlit N II clronbeck nr al I In the Third I district court promlanory Inlay TMAh lo collect IHO o a certain |
