| Show I I I I I I I i I I Ililt f P GRAVE QUESTION I I I I Ii lllitd Error by the Stele Supreme I 11 h I 1 I I 1 coati ID a Rolo I I 1 I I I I or GREAT nUREIT TO UNirilS I I a 40 I I I I I hitting Airily of Legal Tilnt nppor I I i lag a Ullllon for A I I I I Itaiarlif is I I i I I IJ I i 10 1 J I I a L I V1 I I Horn time ago In IB action between O the North 1jlnl ClldI1 Irrigation I 11 p 4 I I II7J 1 Irriga-tion company plaintiff lOll the Utah I III 1 I and Bait Lake Canal wrapnyd < ni I A > 1 I tnti pending In the ThllJ district N I lll I hardi lllchirdi A Court Momors 1 I I I I j t I J J i toplatentleal The I plainiffle strived tot j t IV t temporary Injunction which null n it WM oTtrrutJ From the lullog deny I Z 4 f Ai i log the temporary Injunction imp t I tflj teal WON Taken I the Btatt Kuprem I p r 1 f I 0 court a I I I On Ike hearing In the letter Dart I 4 ll I ti I Ik illgliyi fir I The difenJanl objected I I 1 If JJ ob-jected loth I Jurisdiction of f ih court I it I II I rJ OB the ground thai app ali from f tdli I or I Irlot lo the Blat Supreme court riuld I P41 I I i i V1 I t trI I 1 I be taken only Horn OnI judgouUM tr-I I 0 s 1 tbeljliltoooiiltulln did uot author I I I it 11 I i I I I led such appeals the objection WM I ill j luitilnd and The appeal alimlixJ I i A 1 v T 1 The letter ruling occ looi4 ion I i 1 1 Y4 I I I I 11 ildritl comment among members of I I I V II I r j a the bar IUd torn ol the mOl 11 i I rJ 41 iromlnenl l of them whin they I i I 11 I I I I learned that Mmri Ilchrdi t J I r I and Hlchardi wr priatlog it 1 I I I 1 j 1 I t 1 I t brief la support ol t plllloo for t I I I I rcbarlig limited to I be allowed rejoin il I i I i I 1 1 blob request wi readily granlij 1 I I J I I 4 I bents remarkably strong array ot 1 I I I 1i a I 1 t legal talent In support of the pllllio I I i it I rJ Others would have 1611294 but the i J I i jI 1 j at number Who Lila Was cohldll home I l t t I IV fa look 11 A Ii In all the If N UnUforr In UIa of J i i r 4 I western start appeals have lat tam I I 11 In limits by the lower I court ah ouch 1 I I I I I Visitors 11 ippllcatum for temporary I r lbuoollom pending the final deter lId I ro t = ii mlnillon of on action sod the 11 1 It 1 rulliflby Ib Ith rluinm court f I 1 I I i it nololloDlloI this praeticti bones The 11 I I I I gretlulreiton Ibparl of member I 1 i I of the last 41 I I I I Following It I The pillllon for f i hoar t 11 let 11 i I I II < I 11 11 I I f 10 I JIC T3115 urnu OOUIIT or 7112 fI i 1 STAIR VI UTAII I r i j J 1 I 4 V North TolBt Cooiolluteii Irrlillon I 11 II I 1 1 I Compioy IliloliU vs tudlUepondiul li I iJ I t I 1 The Ulan aid Ball Lak Canal Com I I I I AP I hl 0 IAL 1 Defoodautstaill Appat JHfiji l = I a I 4 I 1 I t I II I 14 il I I > I it 4 rnmoN ron im iiEAnino I It I I i I I 11 i 14 Now coins the defendants mod toll I I 4 11 i 11 t lIu the Caters lot anbirlug ol The I I I I T I above ulllltd Cause upon the allow i i I Jail grounds lowltl I 1 I I J I I The Coal erred 10 IIltmtuloclb r I F4 appeal In Bell cause i t 0 I hm I I p3 Tude Court erred In applying tat ii I I I A the CoallluUn 01 Commute at Utah I i 1 I the rules applicable to the Construction l ot the UonilllullOB of the Coital 1 41 1 y Ulatei I it l 1 ti1 I t Thereto ol conduction applied 1 i Ijiltj It by 1 the Court In this Vale to loappllea 18 I II X lit to Hlal diminution I I I 4A 11 4 The maxics iipmilo using James It I 1I i I 0 eioluilotllellni II veto rpllc All to till I I I I r t t i A 069 The provision section 0 article i 1 11 I j I 1 lk i I 801 1119C01111111113410111 uponimulchtlis |
