| Show lilt HLAtl Ml 1IIL lVMIf la must ot I the states legal nol mint imkM the husband and litbtr M Ibo hd uf the family liable for the support of Wild and children to tile tilenl of bl ablllly to tofu it Drill Hood Two knot olllJ upon the theory that they are Mi by natural rtliilou ship brought I about bJ lili Toluulnrj action but also 1 bwnuta of thy well aouipieb udd < not that In I btovruln husband and Wife there u formed a copa it Del billp lu the nature 01 which I Iho Kiln dove tier share of walk lu Iho liuuo while the but band iptolal oppurluully li I lo Mourn that portion of tile livelihood which counts through oulMdu labor In till Defeat there li uUlvurun of lull In which the Ill dove not always Imvu file least l burden wlillo tho cbll dreu being for ita n lnlpliM or di pamlfUt look lo both tiaicDli for tte aid duo from that muiler frum the mother In household duties and the father In providing much nioeeeltlet uud Contrails of life m ha U I Able to arn Where husband and father fall to provide property for wlvMond children when they am able to do to the law rovldw n Futility for I the 1111 feetDenture Denture the legal obligation under whlnh Mm hub d nud father Kin rt rin t uiiortlnic Wife aid ibl drun B in I ily 4 uo I elo In lutit rite i a IL J I cud tonal usa us-a ou or tao ve > j uignrm char I r tn < ue onib direction lu I I I nit I o t may bo Him mil here vive uauo In I tlo Community with n Fonts tf Juftlon Bin woulj attempt In find any IteWS for Ito flood of n family who fated to tlo file I bo 1 I In I nip port I wife and children tt U I With then a nailer of Peered honor thatrlw above lharcrUlitmenU of legal enattmentoand Irini which as elllnee they would loiru lo Noape even If there wore na law on the tub act actHo Ho far M the Latter Halnti aro eooeernmt tile religious principle cl revponilblllly ol the ljek I I of like family li lot forth In tile command ol tile Lord who Hid In a revelation given ANII 8018 > 2 onDNinlng women and children chil-dren Vernon have claim on their huaUntli for theft milnlenance uill their huilnudi am liken 0 0 0 4 All cblldreu have claim oral little parents for their main lenience until they an of age This dlrMtloa In the Halnli U I binding upon tbrm M Ibo law of UI l and any tllorl lo avtde It would be l a violation punlih able 1 by the withdrawal of fellowship There It I no one worthy tile Dome of I IAttatIfty Saint who would wilfully refrain from doing till tot to tapper wife slid cltlrJren On a recent oouelou 1rcildent WIN ford Woudrua called attention lo title principle and made special mention of the fact that In cawo where there were plural wlvw while Ibo law Mooed by 1 Congress forbade the Totally aeeoclillou there was In It no Intimation thai would excuse legally or morally a ruin from rovld Ingfor moli wives or their children and ni 1reiUent or the Church be elated that any man who refused net h Support wag under severe condoning lion Thauillooof thh roolll1I Ills ben ktnerally recognUed by IhoM sulfide the Church M well at In If and writers among the former hare not 1 teen blow Uexprmln asphalts Ian guiga their contempt for Individuate who would shirk their natural reopen tlblllly toward Incident women Rod children bound to Ibm fey the nioet sacred ties The heads ot famlllM who engage In this ihlrklng builnvee are few and between I 1 anting Ibo tIlalo If Indeed Theta can to found any 10 rcgirdltM of honor and manhood and If theta be any they obtain no ejuinitby or respect therein from their oorrllslonliK who are very much of the same 0110100 at the Apottta 1aul Kliati ha wrote on I this lulject to I Timothy Hut If any provide not for hit own Abu eeftclilly Ooll Di for Ilicio ol big own house he r1 denied lha filth and li I worse than an InflJel I |
