Show HENRY IWIUI WI So 8nalo Ct 1 6 Ili 1rt xUuIkC The Supreme Court has handed dou an opinion In the cone of the Deseret National Hank vs Henry Dlnwoodcy et 01 reverting life Judgment of tho Thltd dlstilcl court Tho bark sued tu have I certain juaiuntee leformed and also demanded demand-ed Judgment after reformation ngaliit I the defendants for SM93280 I being set out that they as the directors ot the HurtonQardner coni > an > had guaranteed to return any sum of money furnished by the bank outo the company The Information asked fm was lo am nd the guaranlce so that It ould cover past Indebtedness In I the sum of 120000 evidenced bj two prom ISHOry not for 110 000 each vv hlch wee signed I In I 1 of the directors except I Henry Phlosoodey Judge Cherry be I fore volvoin the Came was tried leformeol the giurante and renderedjudgmer anullnl tho defendant tar S21103 75 I 6 From this Judgment Mr Dlnnoodey appealed ap-pealed The Supreme Court holds that Judge Cherry erred In reforming the guarantee to make It cover indebtedness indebted-ness Incurred prior to Its execution The judgment Is I accordingly revers utth direction to the lowe court to make till accounting between the parties par-ties and ancei table the Amount advanced by the bank subsequent to the execu tlon or the gurant still to render Judgment against Dlnwoodey for that sum Mr Dlnnondey admitted that ha was liable for such amounts Me were advanced hy the bank after the guar ntee hut I Is I claimed that the com pny algne paid the mame |