Show I I I Fourth District Court The followloe business ties been trincactiil In the Fourth I district cour 1 It e ilnts has ccmmeoosd tur o Instil U Blutnenthal oC ld 535 damages which be claims to logy talnej by renouof defendants fall lug to put In such n beating apparatus Itableremidotgoosit t limy agreed tofu 1 ultb UK Cocfman la Mr Ulnts attorney U W Dunglns vs Willed Ku taut uemurrtr to complaint anU J and iubinlltod Alma Ilbylauca hake oommenctd suit for divorce atnliiat Urace IX Boy lance on the grounds ot desertion whlot la allegeu to have takeu nlaa ou January I It til Plal 0 till praja for a decree ot divorce and equal rights I dd with defendant lu ngard to brI carr i custody and oinlrol of one mlcor child Tbe parties are from Spring I vllle and Krrr mirrled at Halt Lake January TI805 Imt fall Mrs Uj lance braught nult for divorce gtlnut her husband oharglng cruplty aground a-ground Judge Hal h who boN Ilise case withheld his uccltlon till April lot Light year At that time NIP lUy lance asked for a decree whlcu Judge Duaenberry did not leA l Justlllnd 1 In < giving HS he WPS n < < l acquainted with the acts In the citeanu defendant objected to a decree belug given to plaintiff flaw be his ccminenced iroceedlniii ae wlllbn cceu from the above D 1J Hoult li his attorney |