Show DONE IN OPEN COURT llajkens Other Indictment Aleging I tttempttd Bribery A SLTMMI UF I t CJtHLH I l > i miitdthi thOr Agtait 1 llatltrOlliir lltrai of Inlertil On Ibe opining ol the Third dliltlct cur RJiy County Attorney Wbllte recre anuounceJ tbat Judge CC Uiy attorney for Martin Hayken Ihe agent of tli Andrewt Furniture company io I alteidy under Indictment for attempting la bribe the exielectmen nculJ enter an appearance for Ibe ao cuied on anotner InJIolnunl charging Ihe nine oOeuie Judge Uey entered Ihe appcaunua I ilatel and wai furnlihed a copy cf Ibe bill ajluit bli client An additional bind ot 12000 wai required on Hayktn btlitlf ad furnlibnd Tin attelirt at bilbery In tbe In tuadipubllo today li I in ctn luctlon 111 a momber III t Ibo City Council M J Cheeieman Mr Cbeeieman rejected tbe oiler Hit itatenitnl appeared In Ibo Ntws I literal day ago Judge Mertllt next IDol up Ibe elllng of Ibe equity calendar and me r appointed I for hearing tatloui date up lo Ibe JJnd Initaut Alter Ilili builniH wai dlipoied of ae follown Frank Knox vi The Qroeiteck com lI 11 10 to r Hick Atoold vi 1 Kliemtn et al 1 leave to file amended complaint I T Hlnger v Hall Lake I Coplr Alouloclull < < order to paint roof ol building < < and lo pay tbe I Uigilt clilm OeU 10 et to 111 aniwer for A Hanauer Irnitee ud F 1lerce iiibitliuled for ly o Hlrett ai attorney 1 1 iied feidelvi John Je Reid lull ml i Chit C Diy vi U U Hardy et al etlled and dlimlued Ulnlt llotbwll V Archie Fratm it al cie referred and parlle to agree pllli upou refeiee ltlhir Walker vi Hall Lake City lie Irauferred lo bd of law catendr lor trial HuiihJ Cannon vi Iluckborn Uold aud Hllvcr Mining company el al 1 ouuitordeiaoaie referred and If partial par-tial cannot agree on reference the oourt will nme one JU MilchII vi Francli Vaicof 1 dlimlued Theophllu 1anoui TI A 1 Hyde lemurrer to cotallot overruled wenty dye lo aniwer A Ceticbluo vi II OarJell lull dlimlued Frederick Ielertoe a Dative of Hire dO wai admitted locltlMuihlp HUICIIllOX VI 11UILB1U Mrt Uelle Huloblton made complaint com-plaint before 1 I Commlnloner Horn mtr loday agtlntl Mri Klla lull llolh reelde lu a lodging houie al74 it Flrit Houlh itreel and the com plalnauti deecrlpllon of tbe aocuid plctuied tbe latter ai terrible wllh her tongue when arouied Bho laid tbe 1 > llce bad been alrald lo lltteu lober comlIlollloO they did notilarelo irieillheoUeader CommlielonerHom wet I notaglnl pbytlcallybuttheeX 1lloD on I cuulnuo 1lcld that be thought Ibe mJeity of hli court could awe Into a retionable degree de-gree of Hence even a Xinllppe 10 be nformed Mta Hutcbltou tbt If tnt laue wai jutt mid the wai giving an iccurale account of what had occurred II would lake appropriate action In tbe cat Tbe police loc tulgbt b 1C red but he believed Ihe ltiellU stllce bad the reqiilelle amount of cuurage and I tnat did not the United Hiatei inanhil and mllllla would ho njul lo LIB i > cca lon lu lervlog the wrrauu 01 UullodHtatei uQIcer Ae a IMter Judge Homuier plced Ibe warrnt In tba baud of Ihe gonMiy ilierlll who lo bilngu deputoj tueprltonor Deputy Moot MAY BELI IT The cue of aaull agalnil Wm II Jloyd of tbe Tint ward wai let for 10 a m loday before U H Comtnliilonir Utennman t tuUered lOm poitpone uent till tomorrow The ctue for Ihli rroooedlng li I a probability that A lUnigen wbo made the complaint and lea accuied liny title Ibelr little dllletencB and beojme good frlendi without law I tbe nreiiure of the criminal NOTES The trial ol Robert Kgberl and John liidner ol Weit Jordn ended In U H Comuiliilonir 1ratli court ynler day alleriKonaller Ibe NLUI wentlo ireii Tbe ooutt found both defendant defend-ant guilty ot axull aud fined then SIS each aud coili Heniy llilm and Htrah Hitlim bavebeKUn luliinlbe Third dlilrlcl court aualnil Htmuel llilra and Walker lltoi alleging tbt In the year 1111 plalnlllli are Informed and U llovr tbuy executed a warriicty deed to Ml 7 blook I lenacte plat 1 I if Field eurvey to dleudaul Hrauel Hailam whole tbelr tun The deed w i placed lu eecrow with Walker Ilroi 10 be delivered lo Bimutl lUi lm upon Ibe death of Henry HaiUui and II till leiunlne In Ihe K ivilon cf W korltui The plalutllli ba > Oi lon nil Iti return wblah wa rotuied Walktr Ilnw declaring that they will delker eanie lo Himuel Hailam at tbe death of Henry Helm according to Ihe term ou which 1 era depoutrd wllh them I U then alleged tint the deed wai obtained by Hmuel Ua lam without mull tuition and by fruJ anliiullnei 1 HM loth Uliitlll I < are r tjt earirer < cllTelyand In lotble hiallh and were Iguoiant l of Ihe purport of Ire dei l when they lUned II Where re plalntllti ply that the deed be eurre drltd lo them and be deolied null aud void and tht It be adjudged that uc tike pan ly 111da |