| Show fourth lllsliict Court Judge Hatch yesterday In too habeas oori us proceedings In the care ol Room Hnell vs Parley OHmoot rendered his decision which was egslrlt tbe defendant A motion lo vacate the order of arrest ws then made and set for hearing on the 7th The come ct Ira D Wines et Solve 1eter Linen et al came up In the afternoon after-noon ri Illinois sue for fISO II Is I claimed defendants are Indebted lo plalntlOt on an agreement entered Into In-to about two years ago between rlalnllflsard defendants to secure the Keecan pickling works for Lehl Ilalntlfli paid or become liable for the money offered as a bonus for the plant and they want defendants to lay their share of this amount The suit It aitulnut James Event E II Davis Jr rbomai Brown and li W Bro w I the defendant Larson having stilled with plalutlfli W U McCornlck doing business under tile ame of Callforala Win comoitny ban brought suit against M Duinlca ll I collect J35l 95 claimed t9 be due for merchandise sold add delivered de-livered between Jan us Y III 1893 and May 10 li > 180S The complaint leu forth that uuiluc a portion of pold I time the defendant did business under Ibo Dame 01 L U Dugglnr but DOt wlthilandlne that fact Ibo business waiundsr and operated by defendant and the Roods were sold to blm entirely entire-ly upon fill Credit and at him ipeclll Instance and nuucsl J W N Vuttfoalton Is I attorney for plaintiff |
