| Show I I LOWEn COUHTAFFnUl D f 1 I i 1 Supreme Court Decision In an Insurance 11I Companys Case Companys I l 1 TOO WOMEN ARE GIVEN DIVORCES 4 i 31Afflerkolt111 or 1131ttsiliVote District Court Short Otdo 1 Calling The Supreme court handed down an 4 opinion today In the case of Charles I JIaynard respondent a the Locomotive 11 Locomo-tive Engineers Mutual Life i Accident I I Acci-dent Insurance Association appellant 1 affirming the Judgment of the court below be-low 4 I lowThis This case was appealed porno time t 11 1 ago and reversed the question Involved In-volved being whether Maard could re I i t cover from the Insurance company und I I un-d Its bylaws In force at a time when I 11 i he received an Injury to his ee but I amended before tho cause of action t acton 1 was made complete Tho court held I that all amended byelaw wo not r i tractive At the second trial the lower I I court found for the plaintiff The defendant 11 de-fendant objected to the Introduction I of any testimony on the ground that 11 the complaint did not state a cause of t o < lon In that It did not contain tha I I I I I words bodily injury The court finds a II t1 no reversible I error and sustains the 1 Judgment of the court below I i I 1 I The opinion Is I written b Justice t I Uattch and concurred In by Chief Justice II d Jus-tice Zane and Justice Miner I t f I |