Show GOMPERS IS 1 ACCUSED ACCUSED BY BY BERT fRANKU Declared to Have Put Pat U i Money for Bribery of J LocHwood A ALOS LOS ANGELES S. S June Samuel dor pers J head ead of ot the American Arcan Fed era tl of Labor sent sent the money monay direct C to nce S S. S Darrow which Franklin Frankln h has hu t it t titled was 8 us used In t the e b bribery of G N N. Lockwood according to t a lin Jn under cross examination toy today toay In t trial of ot Darrow Darow for alleged jur Jury bribe In c connection with wih the t ra Cl ca Franklin said sid Mr Mr Darrow had bad given hi hJ this In Information Franklin testified at the tile same il that Darrow Darrow had told him ha worry about boul Job Harriman being i I li in hI the case cose e. e Harriman Dam an told tol the tho witness t. t could account fo fot l visit to the tho safe Ilfe deposit vault vaul the morIn mom mor In lug Ins he secured the 1000 b by th the tha fact th he lie took out OO to a mortgage pay 8 sa Ii a Franklin a The conversation converston In which name was mentioned was wad Incidental to newspaper account purporting to t ihl h that thal the tho used in tho tha Lockwood c ca had bad been ma marked ke money 2 Money Traced Trac I asked Mr Darrow Darow said Raid It If he lie had ha seen In the tho th papers paper district attorney had ha trac traced d the mon men from tho the safe depo deposit lt vault vaul Int t hands bands of ot Mr Mi- Darrow and and from tram tere there Ir Irin irmy Ir in my hands handa al also o that tha it i was wa mak mark money my I asked Mr Darrow If f th tb any wa way for tor the money to be tract traci tAt He said Bald that the money mone- was sent dinto din dinto dinto to him b by Samuel Samuel Gompers f Franklin also testified to another co cc ver aton with wih tho the d defendant m In int C H t course of which he said Darrow h asked aske him for lor a a description ot of thence theJa and accommodations at th the San Sn and Folsom prisons I 1 told him the b bI tu tuI I could said tho the witness I I wa was u thin In lag Ing seriously about that myself Qu Questioned stoned as aR to conversations folio foU folioing Ing ins hl his arrest with wih Attorney Davis Davit Franklin Frankln claimed the privilege declining to answer o 0 utile ground U Davis Davi was his hil attorney He that he did dM not intend to draw draw Davis bans Ir the ce cased case f Chie Chief Counsel Couns Rogers for the efen 1 claimed caime that Franklin waived ell eli leges leges' when he lie took tok the stand for 1 prosecution Judge Hutton Huton ruled rull that Frank Franklin n 1 not privileged to withhold any comer with his attorneys ty Franklin then told of converst with Davis concerning the tatters tatter's at r. r to his procure release upon oS fine nL m Told Davis Did you sou ou ever toil tel Mr Davis th that t Lockwood had solicited a bribe of of v vand and that you wanted to t catch hii asked Roser Rogers g Yes I thInk It Jt was wie 11 In the tha office c Mr lir Gage GaJc was the reply I 1 told Mr Ir Davis that Lck Lockwood I ca cato to t my office and solicited a JJ Franklin said he had made this th e st mont to Davis Davie after the Matter later hn bad had ranged for tor his hi plea of guilty Rogers drew from from the statement that Davis had told 5 say that the money used In Ia 1 b bLockwood bi b Lockwood had been sent to t him hm 1 Chicago Franklin denied that h hAi ever p el er told a group ot of newspaper er m m im his preliminary examination that D had nothing to do with lh the al alleged bribery Ho lie 10 also alo denied making re menta to leV newspaper paper men avowing rows row's Innocence t A number of such uch statements statement were r r rby rby b by Rogers and each lh denied b by Frankl |