| Show ALLEGED MINING DEAL FRAUD Patrick Condon Brlrtpj Suit Against CI Mi Freed and Others THE COLLUSION OF 1ARTIES Ia i < hnriel llllllel Imprrlr 10 I ale Napoleon lilc lal l hil III Tlllr Th 0 anerrltr Ir Th freed rurnllum unit Carpel company Hyman A txlpilcrr C M I Freed nnd Prank Non I Wt mad do fcnlanla In I tho Thlnl I llntrlct court to iliy In n null bmuitht by Patrick Con don tar the SeuIflr 1 hento ChaIn at n certain ronlrncl ur fur I lie aum ut llooo In race Hit mint cnnnol now 0 Imil ImilThe complaint abIde that In Hep lember 19 Iho Freed Furniture and Cnrpvt comnnpy and 1 C II Frwl rr the owner and In mo aarcl Ion ttt un un Jlilded fUlccntlxtyfnurth Inherent In the Napoleon lade l minim claim Tin lie but that Iho legal Ilil ennuI In 1 Hit defendant LIIlhr who held lIne iianio In trutt for the two other defendant U I then alleged that plaintiff did the niummicnt work im the claim lira underttandlng MnK Ihnl I he should Ia I given an option In putcha lIme Inter eat nf hum defcndnnla for lime I aunt of lInt In puraiianc of purl Agree local I I Alleged Hi defendant 11 alrh Ihu Crmh Vnll acut Carpet company Ilpilgor executed n deed tran ferlnit Ihelr Intrrofla la plaintiff depotllng Iho tame with Ham J Kenron ttllh an eacrow agreement in tlitncd l all I lIme writing by iinrllct The tcrnia or the ctcrow gnvo plaintiff no I In I alleged Ilio right to the il leiI protldcd he pnld 1 Ken > on the turn ol llsoo an or born re January 15 Ml I I then nllged I Ihnl defendant Ulpnlger lifting unler the direction of I 3 Freed 1 mil the Prec1 Furniture cart Cnri > et company In December UPC delltere n deml or the prnptrtr In Frank Knot who had the Bam recorded re-corded CI7 I further I nltcsrd In the complaint Hut Knnx paid 1 n thlnK for lhnr deed but llml he entered Into rolluilnn wild the other iirndanta In I client unit de 1 rratil i plaintiff cant of lull Alleged rl Ih unIon further thai Inlerrnt In the properly la I Imp north lom that ho tendered the IIMO In Kenyon cal l Knot nnl I nan utamli truly nnl will Inir tn pay the money upon the Irnna rr cit the illiputeil lm reet Wherefore plaintiff ilrinamli Judg meat for Hie tpecln performance of the contract nr for the > um of HMO I nrnn Ihe mining rlnlm han Iwen tranferrcd lo mother lon unit Hint Ihe deed rnim Ieptlger lo Kn IMT decreed Ia I In I > f rail Iulnl anmi 011 nltorner llrnwn A llrnlrrr lire Condon |
