| Show I q1I I f I SISTER BUIH 111 U BROTHER d 1 f I I And Ak Hint lie ll inquired lu Ae 1 II yyu for id 2 front 1111tP I I t The came of Clara Dlckrt against I v Ierdlnand Dlckeit la I being tried before I i < be-fore Judge Norrell today The partie I I r 0 t I 1 4 are Ier and brother Illld the former I I 1111I t sauce for the rents Issues and profits N Income of certain I prembles situated r the I In Popplestlorf Germany foni the IIlh a V i df January 1883 up to and Including 1i I I lt 1 C 1 V It tile year 1890 The mum sued fort Ilg t ger gates 5150 divided a for-t follows II I I 11 I I > d t I 3tOO on the rents and 11 clahn for MOO marks or 1350 and 3800 alleged to be rua rdl i3t Sot i dt L tl due as a debt of the brother to the Mj I I TI fr I 0 state The complaint alleges that In August f t 1197 Clara Dlckrl rellied Ilt PopplerI 11 i 4 dorf Germany and that 1erdaIl0l I I I Dlckert readded at Halt Lake 1 City P E ft If I yfijJ During the month and year named It Ii fl II alleged Frhllllld authorized Ills I I sister to purt base certain hands toTho tln Wt frorn Them Dlbkert father Ii 4 of the panic The agreement i I I I Wan that he nurcha should bo made I I In the lIam and for the benefit of the defendant upon certain < conditions The I ii rIU 31 r i 1 transfer of the land I was made In Oc I 1 I tober 1879 The property consisted of it i 1 a piece of tin elder Dicker homestead I I r I t being I at Loulnvnestnuise Popplesdorfi Ger any The conditions of the trans I i i J fr were thatFerdinand wa to pay I if the debts of his fattier IImolllt which 1 hI f I WIUI the um ot 6100 inarl or SI 310 JIi III In United mate money owIng Adele II I Klals an aunt of the part es Another 11 1i l I agreement was that the defendant f 11 hould pay his sister JKOO and still another V k an-other agreemnt provided that Clara 1 I I Ax h Dickert should receive the rents of the r I estate Jrom and after the fathern It I t mun ndhfih hin It I 1 death and until she should marry or 4 j A L die 1 4 On the Hill of January 1883 the I 11 I 3 1 father Thomas Dlekert died and the U I tll i 11 rationing July plaintiff alleges that t iI L she ered empowered one Dr meh or Germany I i Ger-many to collect the ents and turn them i R r PIl Ii over to her The brother ItlTll s alleged lIilltJ 2i Mh countermanded t the order gliveri Dr nich and forbade him Paying on his Ip a a count or on occount 01 the trust any 44 i I money to his Bister iLl t jl I I I i H It Is then stated that the Aunt Adele I It A 1 Klals died on the lat ofjuly 18SO bequeathing i 4 be-queathing tan plaintiff 1 the 0400 marks I lUll I owed her bythe defendant I ll I Afteiays death or the father plain I 1 fl I tiff says she left her home In tier li po l many anolcame 10 America octlllg an J h t family Jlelng unfamiliar with the I English tongue she relied ImplicItly IJ r upon her brother Upon his repeated I Promise to IOY hr what he wan owing Jltlf her plaintiff failed to renew the mortgage it I < mort-gage I required by the laws of Germany b Ger-many thus losing her mortgage Hen r and security on the land It Is I further I fur-ther alleged that defendant wilfully misstated the law to her and wrong la fully advised her on the renewal nf the I mortgage It la I also alleged that he Pt had a fraudulent purposto In mind when il 110M V I lie Induced her to come to America t 11 I PIOn the first of May If89tm the com 14 I plaint alleges the defendant returned I 4 to Germany selling the property l col t J Ii i I I looting the rents soil couvertlllg < tire 1 n Jl 1 I I t Bam to his ow n pocket Judge Itowit was In n somewhat igo f J li r r i I I f I I humorous mood tillsTnorning anal sug I I nested that on account of so i much of It I I III 11 the reading matter being In Cormanit 11 be tried before Judge llolnpp T 11 Whats the alter with Judge Me ill I I Carthy Pnqulrr I Judge Powers j is 11 11 The case had I ot concluded I at press time I f I The plaintiff Is I represented liy Judge y I Power nnd Attorney Joph Ilppman 1 1 and the defendant by Judge llouat 1 I unit Attorney Krueger 1 Plaintiff says site yan kepI In Jgnor ene of ill e snle unlll the latter part or I J i I 9r gn learned of It then through i I rorrespondenve with some persons In 1 OermallY I Plaintiff prayR for sn Actountintr from the defendant and noulIllI I jllgment file tile um named I Defendant In lilt answer denies the I nlegUolIs or till sister IInd as n apnr I Mao defense eta out that the money 1 claimed by his sister bas l been paid her I nod I hat furthermore action In ths I I came is bare < by the stututo of Hard lotions laton Conldrabl lime won 101en up today to-day In arguing the admissibility of ilia 11 certified copj of the poer of attor ne > from the defendant and to the I I Plaintiff I I II I I iJintan let Three < Years I I John Jjingnn adjudged guilty by I fl jury laid week of burglars waa thic I I morning sentenced in theo jcars In the Plate prison Inngnns offer was the stealing c Il ot ot double hal npvs elollglnlT 10 Jamse W Fox Tr I The prloller air e went into hysterics I after the sentence w no prcuouo and I wa some time before mile could lie quieted Iallglln Was Inken to the Pont I entlary this nHnooll nlpul II kIn k-In the case of W S Post MI Georgia Fote at III n motion 10 set ollle th I sale of corlalll toc or the Diamond Coal and Coke company uan matte Iy I the defendant A lumbH or witnesses wcre examlne and the case D act I I frr argument today I T W Jennings and 11 W Iaden were sureties on on optical bond for 3100 6n hlh Mrs GeorlTl Foole wa I Irlnrpnl Tu secure IhemehK Jon nlngs and Madsen held C20 abates of I Block of the Diamond Coal and Coke company worth J12000 In SIS 009 It fell out that tire sureties had to pas the amount of the bond and they realized on their security hy selling the CKO I hares of stock for SO I was to set this Kale nslde n fraudulent that the mnde nUon I was The parcel of stock of tho Diamond Coal and Coke company has been the subject of a good deal o litigation IInd Is I at present In the keeping 01 County Cleric Dunlar pending the r I aut of ni alpoill 10 the Surrmo court 4 AA4 r1tAcdr Sm ftZ1 In the case of Georgia Toote ve the Utah Comment I And Savings bank on account if Die ulcluim lr Ju dgc Olifrrv tin nrgiimcnts wws continued until Mondnj court Calling Tobin Damlool tins entered suit nglllt the Ocnnulll Lend Work 10 rccoer 1500 lomnge for Ihe Iuth of 111A gall Angelo 1llr0810 A Is I alleged that ilia fleptember 41h last Angel nleg < wa employer hy tire defend alit JMpnIlY a 0 common lurr and t htk t by on cpicladian caused by t f turning l Illeftiml dnJf i for OX I I iii care g qr it tire defendant company com-pany Angclo reIH1 such Injuries thlll he died to the Iailltrt damage In tire oum nalOI Judge Cheirl to I ronfllcd tll 1118 home With ymllom ot grippal larry Ualel Illo pleaded guilty 10 I rorgcr a Yrrolil trodig 0 Col pellr1 Q 0 orger Iroe 1 Jude Norrel lodny for ell fence but on motion of the county Ilt tony elltne WAA deferred for care other charge ot forgery week Tit lie t he Pleaded nol guilty i |
