| Show 1IIIT tlltllll till In the dolly hsue of the News dated Jan 4 there appeared an editor let article under the heading The Charliarl Nuisance In tthtch nn oc turrence of that sort thfltj had recently recent-ly taken pine In a Village the southern south-ern Part of the Plate was described and condemned The toot or alleged facts as was explained In the arllclt t were furnlphed by n correspondent one ot mitomia tntomeul was to the effect thai Mery bay In the village over eleven years ot age and some girl lartMpited In the charivari Other statements made hy the correondenl were to the effect that n hoe had hu shaven from man 10 tall In clunhc that the I urrs had been I taken from 11 Wagon and n number ot mall articles i urlolncd etc The News Is I in iccellt of ft letter from another reolllnt l of the place In which some of the statement I made by tie first correspondent are character Izc 1 as exaggerations The second writer says that only flve or six buys all buAone ot Ahom were under fourteen four-teen yeam of age took part In the at title that the horse was not shaven front mane to tall IneluslM hut that only Its mane and tall were subjected 10 i taint > rO that 110 l1urro wp moved ftomlhc wagon but that nothing was taken away from the Place Ie stolen and that It any Complaint has been male to the peace ncers we have not heard of It This writer says Though hilt a trivial alllr compared < with what your car respondent makes Itthe icrpetrat rs are not upheld t or sustained In It by the ople f Added to these remarks are fame allure of a personal nature which the New regards an Improper for pub llcallon even In substance being I In the nature ot recriminations that have nothing whatever to do with he occurrence oc-currence which gave rise to our Orot espundent a comi tali I While the two residents of the Place i differ In their statements an 10 Itnll It sC 10lenUy appears from what they both say that a most le 1 iihemnb pro ceedlnc took lace The boys I thought It n trivial strafe to throw stones at the frogs In the pond but 1 the frog took quite a dlt terent Mew of It So tho participants In Dili clnrlvart doubtless look open It as n trivial affair but It Is ate to say thai the victims of the often Fire demonstration regard It as being the reverse Among people i of respectability re-spectability a charivari Is I deemed an ontrngou Insult which admits ot no opnlogy Whatever It I eldent that considerable feelIng feel-Ing haa been engendered over thin after an la nlmot Inevitable In such cases The parties subjected to such an Inlgnll as a rhrlnrl neorlly and Justly feel wounded and < Incensed and hey are entitled to such amends as the circumstances Indicate To charge the Injured parties with befog I offenders In another matter or dIrection dIrec-tion 10 not the wy 10 make alltc tlon In such n came and cn only make n had matter oro |
