Show IlimiiiiQTiii NATION orhe Inabllnor Act 01 the SlAtin Con 0 1 tuthall ontalll all the tqwnle 1 the forepteof Utah iter tried to the till tier l no matter what MliMmUi may have said I and every i < yl 1 Citizen ahiHikl S ne that the proMilS of this Conall lo CIO < tullon be upheld 1 Ce13 The foregoing learrojoraph la I from the Felon Provo fjxqulrer It Mate 1 the ltiia Ile I Rings exactly While there are K many we eJleropla to Piece the proldso of Utah In a false Unlit before the country It lan I weOP la-n ee trr that the Dimple truth eball 1 met forth TIll may Peorn Ilk too much repetition of the Name thing lo J PI < I too Ihoee who fully understand It Hut I open I the continual reiteration ot falaehoud I ximellmeil require the repealed lose I the j nlall lion of the facli I onI the JUI now and for some months Past II III there has Siegel a eone tf 1 < l effort lo holdup I 1199 hold-up the people of Utah and particularly I particular-ly the majority NO a body of iitodie 1 I breakera who entered 1 the Union under I 1 an agreement which they have Intentionally Inten-tionally violated I In onler la give rulor lo this allnratlnn I n number of Incidents I In-cidents I nrnimenta Inferences slut mla I J 1 statements law > ten I Introiluonl ami fulminated I from the pulpit and the prove which are utterly Irrelevant lathe I la-the iharce There la I no rinJ la Per much attention to them = 1reiloua to the pueMX 11 Congress IEF of the Ikiabllna I tCil the Hormon J quratlon aa widely I illnrueiwl and the more Intelligent t I portholn of the public r o d I as rtl aa of our national rtaleamen is 1 cit 0 narrV liorame enllilhtened on to the fuel Hull J I embattle U a rellalon separate Join Is tood L i nod apart from the plural wife feature 0 Db I fea-ture which created an much Opposition In Christendom They alao became Uoll mhol < acquainted with the rompll rl I I culloni which would certain from rru h < r of r Inv mejauraa advocated toy extremists 7IIII t nn I and therefore cencludol that the news IOu lion if plurnl marriage would acconi the it 11 14LAh kyttj plUh In a few year the nilncllon uf a duo the lyitun without unnroeeeary harsh nee W on neeThe Knabllrit Act for the admission meet of Ulah was framed with that end In ovelit Mew Therefore the clause In relation 1slant ark C to the vexed J litigation was purposely vordol aa It para In that nwaeure rod I It required just exactly what It says to and nothtuu more ThAt la I that Shoo n Is I Htat convention rhould provide by f till ordlnnnra Irrevocable without them con rent of the United Boaters wv the people race I hit of ad State that polyiamoua or lot plural marrlajtea are forever prohibited Xco I prohibit-ed the edTh convention did no provide fill < lowlnr the language nf lius Rnabllnir fit if Act e nclly after considerable debate na to Its exact Krone meanlna anil M limitation Thor wa no I mlaunder day alandlpE About IL no doubt or dubiety nor nit to its > l nlncatlon Hut to render that protlalon blndln unit operative boor a sx and to confine It within the Intended So limit nn additional clause 1 was placed 411 1 In the schedule In theme onto Will nour The lot the Governor and Led III Intiv XJaemWy of the Territory of Nto totals entitled An Acl to plHllah poly I liBiny and oilier kluilieil I Offerings approved ap-proved IV ash A l > 1M In ao far h aa the aame define and Initiatives pen tn nit I 0 for Ito Kil > gamy to hereby drtaril I re I-to be In fore In Ihe Hlale of Utah or There could not las anything more excluelle and ilrHnll on the tubject than that prorlilon U ronllnued Ihu penaltle of the IMmumU 1 Act which or were adopting In Ihe territorial statute 4 naineil but only ao far aa they were thel ImpiieeO for lyiininywhloi wass do Into lined oi the marrying of a huahnnd or to Of i wife during the lifetime of a legal he wife or huibandlhat timing iwiaral > t from kindred atfcnira anu tittering Tw volely u win the contracting ot plural CH31 I marriage There So I no honest lawyer to 4A who vlll contend that It iiiiun anything nil I any-thing more There li I rut fair dfluter 11 who will dispute that propoalllMi The J I kindred otTenaea were not Includnl IUI 1 In the provision but were purposely and tr 1 ri Intentionally n luclnl I 11 I III r to 1100 nnilm II n the Nom 1 f thi 1 Tit nt 1 h Iho nl v 1111 Ih 1 about hid i mt h bri b 1 c looI rnmprhonI1 tn shot m t 00 uhth one 11 lhf 1 1111911 1 and more On thai twal lIAb t a iulrrd statehood the action of the convention and of th i nip 1 who mlfl I Im Com Iltullon b Ink a pi < 1 b I M President f Ih if t lila nn 1 t proclamaii or Hi Sit 11 I It 11 < > th Proof that 1 tho pril ln if th 1 i abllnx A1 hnl hn null4 han h-an the dilute oir tti on quHn thai had IrotiblM Ih nntiur W K thus IliAd forever Th llicorpnr tln Into the ewl if the Steve of the tillwr pnvKlona of the set of im relallng to klndrcl of ferment wiu hilt required by nIt n-It was low by the mpllr11 and pound the Btato glalalurn aa part I ot the compilation allhouwh nn attempt lo Inmxlure those provisions at Iho first eMlnn of that body waa a linal failure Thus It la rlenr and beyond fair dlepvl that the I agreement with the government on thin matter Was Imply Im-ply ugly and nluI that polsorieft i failure or plural milliliters I ehould be prohibited In Utah Vit wne with the Rnqulrer that the provisions of the Constitution ihould IK Upheld Woo Keller thY holy l b n Wo regaid the MIA too the contrney aa either entirely iroundteaa or atarted In ralaeoncepllon of the faote Aa lo anylhlair gold to have iirecwted 1 the states rotnpeet wutr the government whether ongliMttna in 1 fact nr In fiction It hoe no bearing on that real nneatlon of Utah fulftlment of her pledge to the nation That la to be found In Ihe Enabling Act of Congrea and the Con ttltullon of the I RIMr and all Aft U I mismanage mail Irrelevant |