| Show = ARGUMENT OF MR EVANS A Lengthy Vigorous and Impassioned Philippic Against the Accused SAYS HE IS UNFIT FOR SENATE And Hint lie U I a flambtcr a Drtbcr a Falsifier and a Oullty Criminal All Arguments are Concluded Con-cluded Today Mr Hran for the protecullon In tho UwMcCune Itltwry lneillratlun nil 1 5 Icnnthy armimcnt liefore the Icflniho I comrnlllea toilay The i 1 > Woo a > ry tuIooat one In minrilacmt It npmaed the ulmoat ebherence of the defendant in a man ii on tlovoleil In part to nhowlnir hli IIIB 1 unntnc for the mnatoI lot of I One of the rtmarka made wan In Itf ro lo Attorney Van Colt a noM no-M lo the Hiking of a blow by that pntloman at Mr Kmni ai related ilMUhern In tub > bane The ariurnenl fur a brief Introduction wan oa tat It haa often Uen the caie In order to I delect brian who TIn lal le the prohibitory law aialnil be rale of liquor ton to-n people money lo get vvldtnce to etect and contlct peraona pntcllclnjr ib oReniea How nInny deputy i hall ho cnn roJ to c1 oTt 1 tIO U n COlloict According lu ite te iInIatI 1 rOIl Mr Stctno had lru u Lninniuiru a irlne hot Mr Uw limply lutiM thai he UrelrfU lo have rroboratloti ulherwlM It Would merely 1 have bevn hi word iiialnil tlc tunvp Ui you Mllevo the italvmenl that ii bven I made by the main accomplice In I IhU caier If oo u mnvhllon tnt fallow 111I I hall cit tumor CUIII IeCr to I hI wacO no 1lIun dtiiati 112 r A nndldiile for siulillc 4tlcs0000t lawfully I attempt In Inrtuence utie by an oner uf public hrnerta mil talon Uc Huch B tranncllou arnounti ti k antis 1 a LOIn cotton lo the vunuiual n nOlan the mom favorable oflrr lo thn futile Huch n prmllie itould nuke the choice tufts ti inn cuiulleuliona vhlrh oucht rI iiavtf nit iii iinw There enll min la I the diKlrlnn hlh ihoulil Itotrrn IOU HI thl > laK Oppeilnii cuunxl ansi ini minlicra of the nlrlaturv l hut MMIIII to I maintain Hal thin man ii I Inn 11 DIII i mould IK I voted for until Utih clad han It conic to thlv that u man aan In before the public for in iOta of I inn alit n hen I tOo I air U ttitsI l mliii ru Oiii > when hun I isimisa oC flimsily sic i 111011 iiKnleil and that Wfurv the doori of the Henale ihall tx doKnl he I muii u proved cullly TaVe Ihu ciuo of Cuniirimim tints i rita h is I n a yet not proirU cullly sir I bnI1 nu oInl1 hua liu 1 cisisrsi Ti du II lint isaltsi 111 tins Cel ctsrasst I tour Tiiuuuti no 10 lint sinuisi r tht Uriel rule of law I hem and rciuli n conviction before the dii of roiwrcna shall Im I closed r Ktliil him I refer In Judge Dlcksona remarks it iriltrday He said u I do not wish la Indulge In I any Humration I tOmb u i rop > r however lo call your attention to the view tOil i II of n IIInn tunluel U Olod by his own testimony Mr U W I tike II IHS 1 not stand aa high la I Hie estimation nf any one of > url u-rl today ns he till two week act You Know ray what tiny will about his motlvea that bin conduct has Un I questionable In the ilreimcon duct of which no man with any self Mpeet and lonor could I cupitile of conduit such a is I always when II bus corae Intone the court of Justice loots lehuVM from Ihe bench And tot tins very caro he lead from enunciate Ihe doctrine that tlie inurls < ri literal lu tliJ e who endeavor lo dettst irlnie Iii any ul Oust think lest les-t > lr 1 Law thin you did before Has It come to this that counsel iinpjyed I 11 Ir Mriuno unit stand here anl 1 it 1 aeiaie a lawabiding clllien That tiny an denounce right and 1 defend lust on ng and the reprehenslui ha ir because Mr Law has I punctilio trlni Into Ihe light nf day thin alI al-I In irawl irlmlmirv Into Ihe lell II i Stles Menate There I a slut Ill I the Stain In relation gambling ellin lfl livery person who deals IorcarnIcluiiisiptuiaisrcaUssemi to be cpcneii or who conducts cither > m r or employe II hclhe for hire or T > 1 any paint pf fani motile rou Ill lansqulnei rouge et riolr rondo Wbi5yatiisutotrintnttll5uuc4ai PlC ii I ml I r r IIbl pirtlcular Immunity should Ie l eitended to Mr McCune He admit frr that he 11 I n gambler II that Im II In I 11 iOn habit of playing curli for money Mi point counjl said nothing about 1151 turn their gun n pan Mr Ijtw Ih t > pnir man while they defend use ffd l h criminal and talk of sending him J Ike Hrnnte I What a travesty on luitlrer Ah but they say he play only I Imentlemeni Ihen there Is I a differ ciii law for gentlemen and for Incur nn And Mr MrCune I had lists braiun nionlery I to give Ihe names of autumn lnM nssoclaiel with him na playerit n I tush flut rrnl I > lo He nriruments U hive already been made Defense thatni t that fist luSt licn contradicted by almoii every wltncsa In f Ihe casein tMfihlng nI lat I l I have made aa close u illly us I cuts of no tiniony I atm 01 In lhl I caso and 1 defy them now Os fir or ol any other time lo how lOst Mr 1 lAW ha lieen contraellclrd In Shy Important Mrtlcular cosris us n the very act which Ihey must ileny I th I o charge Itself Ii lj with McCune at Hoglea I saloon llcne i lii I nm ul Invitation Ut us rot something It list will understood r act that when A man Is I well fed ho receptivo to altos Al Ihe Vienna ur he open the vonvenatlon Ihere rcoriing to his own teiilmony ho IK11 Ihl builnei by aaylng lo law hOot he had 1 ipsnt oo iniilh I money nl lo e It I now They went to the Me < ne heaibiuarler I dn pasd Into a rrlvate room Olccunuanl thou both Mmlt li may have been loine llm l may have been fHe mlnulei and how do tlloan nn > l McCune remember that conversation orllyt III Ii I leitincl that Mr McCunea m came In and laid The carriage > ready l Thl II I stunted but he ilw not put ion ion on Ihe Hand lo deny Ill for though he Ii I not ailwmed 10 perjure hlnmlf he pat ecruplei to have lila young mm CommIt torJsir In phmhiI lilt trios 0 ntlme when rl unh huh I law nit Ihe Innuenc of Iliiuor MrCunea aon came In and pall rather the carriage Ii waiting There Ia I always lorno prominent fart about I every cue about which I ntheri revolve and which serves to ihow that Ihe mon ipoke the truth and tOll li I the Incident In the conversation with Ion II I Mr 1 AV contradicted Yea by Hloan Well would you eipecl 04 i nan to admit I I he sill Ihere would I nothing to dlacui I tire not what contradiction contradic-tion may eill aa lo Ihe delalla of isinveras Ibis No one can recall hell h-ell Hut hOer waa an appolntemenl with floW JWII ftl an waa lOne calm It la I pull thin auhject waa the eXitence uf leltera proving Church Inrtutnre Hut Wail that I ho only 1 lubJectT When I cornel lo the particular conversation they nhrl tWI deny I II but Ihey might have had hrr t there any mntraalcllon of Ihe fact thai MrCune had a conversation with law over Ihl tCtebhhsli51 T la I It dented thai McCain wanted the vole of Law Wh waa McCune seeking lle > ut > llcan voteit I Olr thin mm wai hiiinjomo half li I the Crust and llepubllcan men ion given We find jtoDiethlrur said over tin ulnchnue bleb MtOoilf the Ahole Ihmry Law won being watched 050 under npldon 10 Mr hun ur lld he I ay when he talked to Thatcher andliving lOts man hIs had n uiMcloua convention with me No usia llL > < wrrn cloml oa to that lie I Imply loll them thai IoW wanted lo oe tshtsifl llyhle own twtlmony In the conversation over the leletihone McCune hreaka Into the conversation nf J IAW and 1 sits If them la I anything you da not want lo Is I heanl do not ay It over the public telephone lIen icnllemen wv see lust fang of the corruptlonliiMrCune undertaking by Oil own wonln lo eupprcua what Uw might nay j the telephone What iusiO lit any Jury say of thla conversation conversa-tion Without any lugKrilloii to there c < nll > < mcn 1ot thli suspicious ci > n vers4tlon he repaired to the Wasatrh ulnus tot There a most rrmarkabli lon thin usccunrel OIuCunc Hired as hi went In a man with new overall on Wh > did he notice that hionT Vn < his IhlrnJnl cIR he waa about to commit haunting him IhenT Did he think he moss bring watched These Illlle thing point with Inevitable certainly cer-tainly lo something that was lurklnK In hli mind Law luceeiird that they m lu hli Toonn McCune auggpste1 a satmm This man nhn la I siandlnu hirn for the Hlltloll cf Dnltnl Hlalea 1 senlolor what was the thing that hurst 11 enlereil Jila inlndr Let us go Into lh lnrk run of some saloon he milI They were there al hOe iiuletesl bul 15005 hour 01 the day ansI hit rna i the hrc Iheleit thing lrCunn slIt 155 I meet him bhrrst antI itsii neat lo Ih tuuaotosi or II elnitO ey In the handshaking And had not lOla > een true If law had nut mentioned It who would have Its covered I Not even Iho Nrnj could haw found It I out rico thiro sneaking In low tones nnl law offered huts vole for ISixw What did MrCunu 40t Did he I spurn Iist offer No hi I clmplv said I want do 1 anything i > f Iho kind I havo enounh vole lo elect 1 me already Why gcnlUmen Is I not this language rlgtilllranl Doc II nol smack of thn llckeilng Do a > nol corroborate Idw who Sail SlcCune declared I wa 10 mUh leCnn loam lnr1 alit petulant al 11 I wan too I much 10 croat a sum he wanted lo drive a clirsomster bargain ho Is I a man of bul ntas I al msat am nitis as IUII say I am Is I what lAW Irhay he nll 1 thai McCune relate could hv 11 sal 11 in thirty second by theo the-o le ViSe hv hOc Ilnnnl oC Iw of the nitlcer and of Horn that They wen Ihere ten minutes Let ua see nh let I o the WMillm < nl of this highminded gentleman hula Immau late cllliei who ll I levklng to be Senator for Utah Ills languago Indicate that he had thoughla of bribery that I his mind IO runs In I m move nf fraud 11 and dcbaurh or he would have until hilt I am not seeking lo purchase my way bIt the United Htalrs Senate I will hue I content lo Iwe my fortune to work vvllh my hand fur a llvellhooel but n ver will I trout lo buy my way Into iilllce lro I say a man vthu Mill make a remark of that kind he did make I lay hIs mind li I not free from fraud and corruption and he nught to be dragged Into the publlo light uf day and eiposed What liiU did he lbs alpped to the counter to get aomelhlnc for hli throat cool I and collected even yet I belleia he went there simply to count over hi LIU He steppe I out and axaln saw this non wlih the ural scnlnremark able fact law Joined him and they walked together across the street He walked with lIsts man who had mane hut boa nrferi bela l at once found with him found In hla company walking wlih htm and alone acros the publi auntel 1 lie noVa lw assIst 10 hll Me 1 lsioe I bOOsts I I vol for you Iny Iso t Why did not MrCune give him lln tame answer that he gave him In Ihe drug itoM lie walked alone with him and talked about his vole told luuon 00W to vole lo I change his vii olson roll cill Henllemen III I not true Hoe Almighty bias burned 1 Into tin conscience of that man Ilia he hired h-ired himself I lie M not only a briber bul a ruMfier Hheeli ond otheri saw dim wale acrosa 1t road with hli hand In hli sinaI lochol TOol Iss ho1 huamsulu l and uuuacd Ih louoey II ooua lhcusreulot nod 101 cunnlna dvle 0hr 1 Ilun oould hav conjured up I arnnoua had been elms by watchlnx for that I Kranl you II might havr limn n Mr outetsocine testined to seeing 110 mon posa I rmlnJ mo tsf a murder case The defendant wai seen In point and r nm the Ililuh the victim I fell In the court the counsel I for defense made tho plea l that n hoe saw the bullet pass This question of who nw the money paa la I Just aa foolish McCune saya he had not thought that I trap I wOn being laid for him lie cots h1 he Ihouaht I tnon 110 Jnkln block Law meant he out have gone with him and would hive been caught In I the act Thurmanlle ellil not aay thaithere la the reporter Didnt he Well ree llcadil so would have lxen caught Juit n you fellow Iniendeil < He notices Ihe language ha hon used and then he adds Thou Th-ou h svcsboaeoto y hits sunny 1u you believe thai of Chief Pratt and the olllcers Do you think McCune IKIICVC 1 t I Ihli we a conspiracy why wa I not carried culT Mr McCune riym three men would have lied I about him If no If they had forme I foul con spinier lo entrap him pray tell me why iSey shut not do so 1ICftlr11 r r Intended to entrap him whether or no why didnt they simply testify so ufI to convict him Mr Mcllme I either falsified falsi-fied In making that statement or Iheie men would 1111 have iworn falsely Why did nol theso men do what Mr Ohncuopota they ltslcnhish I do Only did not Pryer ace the money ° If he hid conspired Mr Pryer Icstlned n any honest man would hun lellned 10 what he saw 1lnd Why wa thl man cartooned and Isus condition when Intoilcatcd inlnted out Jeerlnitly 1 by one of IOn opioslng coun lIt 1Cun alI 10 lIt Junbr who ushed It tsw ouM hut for luirn Pius Ihe lInt ocrsibt thie I one of Iseouhorol bhlg I which these men mhOu say to one another If Laws r foha html had lnen purchased h did MrCune Immediately add that Iaw might vole for htm The rumor b came prevalent at Ihe McCune headquarters after McCune returned Counsel referred to a case In which a man of unblemlhed reputation had later confeised Ihe crime II wai Ihe defendant not the prosecuting witness who confessed and so In this case Time will demonstrate that lists IAn McCune ha I Ihe guilty criminal The chairman here announced that tOo arguments for Ihe prosecution had occupied Ih limit of time lu which tho defense had been restricted namely three hours On motion of Whitney seconded by 1110ott 1he prosecution wna allowed another hour 10 complete Ihe review 1 of Ihe evidence The committee com-mittee took a rrcen till 1 30 p m AI n p 1 m Mr Kvatu continued IsIs argument he reviewed I all Ihoee Ir tIsna of Ihe testimony covering other Issue than thone which come directly under the LawMcCune case proper those portions likewise covered by Ihe argument of Mr 1 Tlmrman I |
