Show A A11EAVY DAMAGE SUIT Bert Leroy Us Suit tho Rio Grande Western > fe 30000 I 4 fOR ALLEGED PERSONAL INJURIES I I 11 1t I 11 ny 01 tho hlnad 81lefluctin111111it In I ln I < Co tootel 11to licit Leroy Leu by his attorneys C C Illclmrds and J 1 and I I Mac Mlllan lied n sin Coo damage suit against lite file Grande Wrtr lion way cOIn in the Tlillit district couit thin uftl > rnonn A null brought by the same piaudIff against the Call load compan was dismiss wll out piejudlce today and tho piesent Putt was filed later The Complaint alleges that on the 23rd of September lWi the plaintiff was emploe by the defendant com puny ns a swIMiman and that while attetiallua to his duties lit I lie com Iay ynaAn In thl city he won thrown dollIt upon the track a cn Passing over hi In leg Cutting I ot uIT Jtwon the ankle and In Imo and Also breaking Ih Lon ut the leg of < u point Close < the knee necepmitatin Amputation disabling 1Iulnllt still pll venting him from attending tu tits tic CUulln Ihe ulld1 I tr1buld 10 the 1p feradants negligence lu allowing a rr Inln holt UPd for tile olluWlul t hold Ing he rake shot In placly 10 Batch nut u distance ut three or four inches In front 0 nh Irkh = n tt I freight eRr whlh caught tile IdalCtIf It 1113 1 11 Iruucr unit throw film Iaolr truck A 31IIng to oil o11 cape ot w n OlIffin Vot W B oOdb lilies tlch commenced before Judge HI Yesterday afternoon van reo Burned thin mornlllo Ju hill complaint Griffin Alleged that on September 1 19 the plaintiff sold to him thP Omar 1Ir mlnln Claim In Lincoln county Nev tr a Consideration ot 100 tn be paid I In four Installments ot 2 w each and the plaintiff dciKislted In the Wells Fargo Co bank In Salt Lake a pa tent and deed to the Plopertythe same IoU be delivered i r to GodbO after tile i final payment shoul be made I wa then e out that Godbe paid 5000 of the amount but refused to pity the balance anti plaintiff prayed for Judg mont for Ahe nnpald portion 3000 The defendant In answer alleged < Moot Griffin wax never In I position to deliver the properly and that one Ur McFadJ uno others have hrcn In open notorious anti adverse Passes Iou ot the min tr u numh r lt yr Defend a nt further PRYS that hn he I ascertained the fact an Itd he cancelled the agreement Judgment for the t000 Is I soiled to Till Ut IUII FIVINVEV naIDd n7 the h a tRa Id Heard s Valid i The State t land board has rendered a decision In the J Curtis recog nixing the Burr survey ot IR ao a I valid government survey of all lands now vented rr the I ity The decision It Is I understood effects About fifty fanallien In tile tlllp Iclnlty of Wellsvlll and Mendon In Cache county nM about sixty families In Merced anti Ephralm Hanpete counly The ruling of the board Is I net forth In the following resolution Resolved That the official survey of section 1C townthlp 13 mouth range 3 east 1 on file In the United States land office In Halt Lake City Utah approved ap-proved February 25 18r7 be accepted hI this hoard an the Official survey ot said I section ito and that awards of right i-to purchase lands In said section b mad In oeotdane with wild i urvy IHipnte Cover n nol The case of J M Thomas again John II Unlley wan tried before u jury In Judge Cherry court today with Attorney Wllllan It Hall for the plaintiff and J f fur for the de fendant The complaint alleges that Thomas was the owner of a hot air tank or boiler worth 160 and that In January 1801 he wall dispossessed of them the-m by the defendant Bailey The de fenge la that ilia defendant cam owner of the licallear by purchase at II sheriffs 1 Pale of the goods ot the J W > Whitehead cap company An Attachment Suit I II1 An attachment suit against George M Scott Co WAR filed by the Wheel Ing Corrugating Company of Kentui ky In the Third district court today to re cover Jim75 for goods wareit and rerchndl rolllng of Ironware etc sold the defendant eempn In Novemlwr 1S91 In Inr 01 n o J Ont A Co The jury In the case or the 10m Inurn In-urn company ut NewYork e 01 Against letter jVofantcoiVturned n verdict tills morning In flavor ot the defendant The plaintiffs sued to re corer IUOR alleged tu ba due Ua un arnd ommllon upon cancelled pllrl The defendant ompuny Contended Con-tended that It wu ulllld 101 the commission com-mission litter the Issuance ot the poll6le l Court Cutting Harry nnddard II petit juror In Judge Che n 1 s court wan excused for the term today Th case of Bert L Loco vs the Palo Grande Hallway company wa dismissed dis-missed without prejudice In the Third district court today l also was the case of John A llobbn vs J IL Ilulse e t al |