Show BATTLE OF THE BIG BAD BULLDOG ERRING AIREDALE ENGAGES COURT T This Is the thc story o of the big bad bulldog and the erring nice nice- d dale le as recounted by Justice D. D W. W Moffat o of the state supreme cort T To give a background it seems th that t Belle Bene M. M t. t Jenkins sued George Forsey in Fifth district court because his bulldog al alle allegedly allegedly al- al le bit her on an n the ankle during an bet between cen his pet and her A X jury deci decided ed against her holding the bu bulldog did not bite her She appealed d. In the decision de de- de concurred in by other justice and granting grantin Mr Forscy's For For- scy's soy's motion to strike her bill of exceptions Justice Moffat commented com corn on the thc merits merit as follows There i i. is a 8 tingle single question n Did the defendants defendant bh big bis bad bulldog bite the pl plaintiff The jury found she was was- not bitten billon by the defendants defendant's big bg bad bulldog From tho the evidenCe the only other po possible perpetrator or was ras' ras a haired far domestic pet corn com com I r 1 l i I R t. t IR t u i known as is an airedale dale whose asserted a. kindly disposition dispost tion might be thought to preclude the possibility of his mist mistaking the fair form of oC his mistress mistress' foot and ankle for the ferocious features of the tho big bad bulldog opposing him with a screen door and a w womans woman's foot a as the thc only barrier between the canine com corn Mr Forscy's Forsey's motion to strike the bill of or exceptions w was f filed led June 21 1932 and argued and submitted November 21 1933 I j d II i t. t j J 1 Jt J C Ct i t 1 f |