| Show I 1 II STATE SUPHE lE COURT I Meeting Pursuant lo Adjournment Held Today and Cases on Appeal Argued k1 TWO MANDATES RECEIVED AND FILED ° I Karrlik or llondmnrii Now llennlrnl tola oUodOoolOlh t q 10100110 Court 111 n n The Supreme court met pursuant to adjournment today with Chief Justice t tf l Zane Justice IJarteh and Miner on the t ii bench A goodly I number of leading at tornejs were present when Court n l opened The first tnse called was thai S h5 W 8 tnu cf Ihe Peseret National Unnk s t lh Movie 13 octane C nl appellants with S K appellants u Kane Costlgan appearing for A Cotta and Jtoyle Dlckson Kills 8 ti 3ills for respondent it Action In the case was ought by the JS 1 sons wrltlen guaranty S bank to reform a S C ns to make t cover past Indebtedness i au1 IIdmnel 1 tao woll OH a future loona S u when the terms ot the guaranty only Included future loans und 1 advanc 1 Th eaoeetvoe trIed bHore Jule Cherry tS ome lime ago who rendered Julgment S ngulnol th defentlant for 1IhO7d tho t J1l tO OUtttOC 1 lor by the hunk being I i j 12000 tk TM lowed tattle med the gurn lI 4 on1 rendered JUdemeattaSnurSlIul 0 ty ttef are II I hI It w the only bu of frt of S 545 t both quellon 5 The Is ulon iI i law nd ft OaDrN WATlmWOllta CASI S oitl St 5 City VloltIIt of odon The ntoe dn I I rponnl ta the IteU IIIcr Irrlgllon S ka lomponY Jarvi waturuatha Ogdtn I a Conklin et 01 ate tett I tflttfttt I Ott tf0 court bfore Iho fluprome veIllt tat 1 e loday 011 IIplal from the ordor of LI t appolntln Thomns D JuIce Holnpp RI i1 a teot celver of the Ogden wterwork 111 1 C t during tho Icndency of tOte t010t to do S e trmln the legllty of the 0coJI001 I td ° Ictea or gilt of Ih ewottr 01gb toOtd I wtuwork ytem ownool hy Ogden 9I 1 ° i a ° city 10 John n 1I0thell ato totter 1101 i s ° wrd IUlBIG11ed hy hIm to the dnd iAu1 ntn M Allison Jr city ttorney of It C C Ogden Sudga Dey 0111 Attolney and for the city DA t tllcharotItoPl0000000 antI C C David Cytt100 tad Judge IIowotl 1 n Vuhn of luon000 city rprenld the e antlII WOO 5 thfh cane It will bo rmmhered A 1 court a few week before the Supreme A I Nu on upplia000000 of the deCendonl on UO writ the l eertlororarl hut t writ of for a ° L liWF 1 ° h woe retoeood the court holdIng the WI 1 comedy woe hy ppol claim Ihat Julge Ito The at00elltoaia 1 ° P erred Op 1 Ihe appoillt of rcelver Iapp 1 1 the natureS octlon It I legal In L The eJeetmenl toad trial of title tot the of an S Iroperty and theodore the equitable rmodY of re < or eannot be granted 2 1he Ilofendant havln prevlouly S at their Intention to move giVen notice o > 0 the court nac change of venue I i Li for a wr to proceed further with the no power the cnMto i Brant tho order changing ° ° ° l A i of trial O ilt J ° I 000CC 3 That having made such order In o ltA 4S ° S excess ot the Jurisdiction of tha court tP4 it waa A nulety S epy 4 That the order appointing a receiver v1l ° op i re-ceiver Is I a final Judgment from which ill 4 on appeal lies to the Supreme court I Ii 1 The plalnllfTs contention leo I I That the action Is I not a legal one lt I but Is I purely equitable calling for on lot O nw hv ho 1rfndnt of the o ULW nl IMue eind m l > roOt received by the tit from Ihe t waterrate defendanls elope l I k Wto Iii and n waterworku syrtcm tort the put of the property rl raVen years the return th prprb which I It li water company I 0 claimed by I the holds the properly as trustee 4oWuoi and for damages for lion for the city I 45u m 1 withholding ot the some and the destruction O I des-truction of the old si slem ps id04ti 11 If 3 That the lower court had power p It i and that It was11s duty to place the lob i S to thll 10 the hnd atucecriverl 10 011 property jn y lit nd prno Ihe rntal arts < r 1 0 leet Ihefrm durIng the pndency of mI 0 the cult aa the present water company j A t ft I iTlnsoivent 1 even beta n moton far I bet-a change of venue woo disposed off I lJ p J That the > rdei appointing a r f I I celver was orr the 1Her of th < i lower court to make ° 0fc Jl 1 4 That the order appointing a receiver 1 re-ceiver Is I Interloculory purely and In I OWI Ig S no sense a final Judgment and the fore not appealable 11 ro Dro Aeepll f The following nnll1 lurare wcre x Id I 0 amlned on their voolr dire toad uCIpt1 of r in I the criminal court this mornln 1 W 3tpdsen John Tlngy T 0 Paul ton Charle H llek Elwlud Marble ilrlgham Solomon T A Wlcliersham Irlham John It Jcsso c Little John T Cone Uwld H 31 o CCI tote Jaaee GI hrt uaoi 110nrgr M enon Jamet leorge Share Hugh D Prk T CWlenpll Jame lOieaartond loyt heman Jr were 1 ecued rOl the lerm Juror Jerume Oi ougurd od Joeph lItton sperger Were excue1 unt next Mon day mornln |
