Show 1 LET1Jlsl IIIltlFIIILS Trial Oil Verdict h thC i or NtU Curl sun IN John M Cal no Judge Hlles took up toy the coM of Nol Carlson against John M Cannon Can-non ns administrator of the estate of I IK late Abraham I Cannon find Jacob Sport Hlcy 1 Jones nnd Judge Dey appeared ap-peared for plaintiff and Ilnrlow Forgo on for the defendant John M Can iion Plaintiff bought this suit to recover the sum of ISU together With Interest from March 30th 1 > 94 to August Sell IS94 alleging that on th 29th of March IS94 at Logan Cache county the defendant de-fendant Sport showed the plaintiff a letter Nhleh he reprevented thnt he had Just I received from A 1 Cannon and which In substance was that the I latter had to get betweei 0 and 1400 and that he hoped Sport could raise It for him The letter woo a 18 alleged to icve stated that Mr Cannon would give his note for the motley Acting on this representation ant also other repress ° tations contained In onolher I letter s EnednAt0lTUCannon plain III olee that he borrow the sum or 1 from the Thatcher Bras BankIng Bank-Ing compan endorsing a check roc the Imount tn Abraham I Cannon I The defense Mr Cannon Is I that Abraham I CAnnon never borrod the money and that Ir plolllUII loaned wtiat he alleges he did I man tode fendant Sporl The latter It Is I under tnl Is I out or the Stat The court gave Judgment for the plaintiff for J141 and Interest holding that Abraham I Cannon had received the money but not knowing how It had been obtained and applied It on a debt of Sports ror thli reason tho court held that Mr Cannons estate should refund the money to Carlon In the course of administration Judge I Title also found 11 that the defendant Sport procured the money from Carl son through fraud and misrepresentation I misrepresenta-tion and the letters purporting to come from Mr Cannon to Sporl were forgeries |